Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom

Decision Date10 May 1988
Docket Number87-2406 and 87-2407,87-2405,Nos. 87-2404,s. 87-2404
Citation526 So.2d 707
PartiesVALENCIA CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Franklin B. BYSTROM, Dade County Property Appraiser, Burt Williams, Dade County Tax Collector and P. Randall Miller, Executive Director of the Department of Revenue, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

John G. Fletcher, South Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Craig H. Coller and Daniel A. Weiss, Asst. Co. Attys., for appellees Franklin B. Bystrom and Burt Williams, Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Lealand L. McCharen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee Randall Miller.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Valencia Center, Inc. appeals an order declaring section 193.023(6), Florida Statutes (1987), unconstitutional and upholding the property appraiser's tax assessment.

In an earlier challenge by Valencia of an assessment by the tax appraiser in 1980, we held that "[w]hat a property is currently used 'as' is often not the highest and best use," and that fair market value was a more appropriate basis for ascertaining a just value. Bystrom v. Valencia Center, Inc., 432 So.2d 108, 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 444 So.2d 418 (Fla.1984). We further held that to interpret section 193.011(2) in the method advanced by Valencia would be contrary to article VII, section 4, Florida Constitution (1968), which provides: "By general law regulations shall be prescribed which shall secure a just valuation of all property for ad valorem taxation...."

Subsequently section 193.023(6) was enacted, which provides:

In making his assessment of improved property which is subject to a lease entered into prior to 1965 in an arm's length, legally binding transaction, not designed to avoid ad valorem taxation, and which has been determined by the courts of this state to restrict the use of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Schultz v. TM Florida-Ohio Realty Ltd., Partnership
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 21, 1989
    ...rev. denied, 444 So.2d 418 (1984) (hereafter Valencia Center I "), and the dissenting opinion does not refer to Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom, 526 So.2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (which was affirmed by Valencia Center III and is called hereafter "Valencia Center II "). Valencia Center I and......
  • Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 27, 1989
    ...& England, Miami, amicus curiae, for Intern. Council of Shopping Centers. SHAW, Justice. We have on appeal Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom, 526 So.2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), in which the district court found section 193.023(6), Florida Statutes (1987), unconstitutional. We have jurisdictio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT