Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom
Decision Date | 10 May 1988 |
Docket Number | 87-2406 and 87-2407,87-2405,Nos. 87-2404,s. 87-2404 |
Citation | 526 So.2d 707 |
Parties | VALENCIA CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Franklin B. BYSTROM, Dade County Property Appraiser, Burt Williams, Dade County Tax Collector and P. Randall Miller, Executive Director of the Department of Revenue, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
John G. Fletcher, South Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Craig H. Coller and Daniel A. Weiss, Asst. Co. Attys., for appellees Franklin B. Bystrom and Burt Williams, Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Lealand L. McCharen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee Randall Miller.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
Valencia Center, Inc. appeals an order declaring section 193.023(6), Florida Statutes (1987), unconstitutional and upholding the property appraiser's tax assessment.
In an earlier challenge by Valencia of an assessment by the tax appraiser in 1980, we held that "[w]hat a property is currently used 'as' is often not the highest and best use," and that fair market value was a more appropriate basis for ascertaining a just value. Bystrom v. Valencia Center, Inc., 432 So.2d 108, 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 444 So.2d 418 (Fla.1984). We further held that to interpret section 193.011(2) in the method advanced by Valencia would be contrary to article VII, section 4, Florida Constitution (1968), which provides: "By general law regulations shall be prescribed which shall secure a just valuation of all property for ad valorem taxation...."
Subsequently section 193.023(6) was enacted, which provides:
In making his assessment of improved property which is subject to a lease entered into prior to 1965 in an arm's length, legally binding transaction, not designed to avoid ad valorem taxation, and which has been determined by the courts of this state to restrict the use of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schultz v. TM Florida-Ohio Realty Ltd., Partnership
...rev. denied, 444 So.2d 418 (1984) (hereafter Valencia Center I "), and the dissenting opinion does not refer to Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom, 526 So.2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (which was affirmed by Valencia Center III and is called hereafter "Valencia Center II "). Valencia Center I and......
-
Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom
...& England, Miami, amicus curiae, for Intern. Council of Shopping Centers. SHAW, Justice. We have on appeal Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom, 526 So.2d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), in which the district court found section 193.023(6), Florida Statutes (1987), unconstitutional. We have jurisdictio......