Valentine v. SOUTH COAST CORPORATION

Decision Date20 July 1964
Docket NumberNo. 21069.,21069.
PartiesWalter VALENTINE, Appellant, v. The SOUTH COAST CORPORATION et al., Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Jack C. Benjamin, Kierr & Gainsburgh, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Harry McCall, Jr., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler & Hopkins, New Orleans, La., for appellee. William K. Christovich, Christovich & Kearney, New Orleans, La., for The South Coast Corp., appellee.

Before RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The district court has, in our belief, fully covered and properly decided the controversy presented by this appeal. Valentine v. South Coast Corporation, D. C., 218 F.Supp. 148. Its judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • 42 498 Kelley v. Southern Pacific Company 8212 1270
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1974
    ...382 U.S. 907, 86 S.Ct. 242, 15 L.Ed.2d 159 (1965); Valentine v. South Coast Corp., 218 F.Supp. 148 (E.D.La.1963), aff'd per curiam, 334 F.2d 244 (CA5 1964); Williams v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co., 13 Ill.App.3d 596, 300 N.E.2d 766 (1973); Waters v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co., ......
  • Williams v. Chicago & E. I. R. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 3, 1973
    ...on that issue, the question should Not be submitted to the jury. (Valentine v. South Coast Corp., 218 F.Supp. 148 (E.D.La.1963) aff'd. 334 F.2d 244.) In light of recent decisions presenting the same issue and nearly identical factual situations, and the interpretation given the term 'employ......
  • Ciaccio v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission, Civ. A. No. 15477.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • October 3, 1968
    ...or constructively, of the Railroad at the time of his accident. Valentine v. South Coast Corp., 218 F.Supp. 148 (E.D.La.1963), aff'd 334 F.2d 244 (5th Cir.); Fawcett v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 242 F. Supp. 675 (W.D.La.1965), aff'd 347 F.2d 233 (5th Cir.); Latsko v. National Carloadin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT