Van Buren v. United States, 10–6194.
| Decision Date | 12 October 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 10–6194.,10–6194. |
| Citation | 562 U.S. 971,131 S.Ct. 483 (Mem),178 L.Ed.2d 305 |
| Parties | Barclay VAN BUREN, Jr., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
United States v. Mullins
... ... See United States v. Van Buren, 599 F.3d 170, 175 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 483 (2010). In particular, congressional supporters "placed considerable importance upon ... ...
-
United States v. Murphy
... ... For example, in United States v. Van Buren, 599 F.3d 170, 175 (2d Cir.2010), cert. denied, U.S. , 131 S.Ct. 483, 178 L.Ed.2d 305 (2010), the Second Circuit held SORNA requires a sex ... ...
-
United States v. Lott
... ... at 38061-62; see also Van Buren, 599 F.3d at 175 (finding an obligation to register when a sex offender terminates his present residence, even before establishing a new one). The ... ...
-
United States v. Lewis
...cert. denied, __ U.S. _, 131 S. Ct. 1058 (2010); United States v. Van Buren, 599 F.3d 170, 175 (2d Cir. 2010), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 131 S. Ct. 483 (2010)) ("Van Buren and Voice were correctly decided. The permanent abandonment of an abode constitutes a change of residence, regardless of ......
Get Started for Free