Van Gosen v. Arcadian Motor Carriers, Civ. A. No. 93-2160-GTV.
| Decision Date | 20 July 1993 |
| Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 93-2160-GTV. |
| Parties | Wallace VAN GOSEN, Plaintiff, v. ARCADIAN MOTOR CARRIERS, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas |
Ronald P. Wood, Gates & Clyde, Chartered, Overland Park, KS, Ruth M. Benien, Shetlar, Benien, Kaplan & Donham, Chtd., Kansas City, KS, for plaintiff.
Paul P. Hasty, Jr., Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown & Enochs, Overland Park, KS, for defendants.
The court has under consideration plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 6) this case to the District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas, from whence it was removed by the defendants. The motion is granted, and the case is remanded because the defendants' notice of removal was untimely filed.
This case was filed May 21, 1992, in the District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas. When it was filed, plaintiff's petition claimed damages in excess of $10,000 without more detail. In response to a request by defendants, on July 2, 1992, in state court, plaintiff filed a statement of monetary damages in which $50,000 was requested. At that time the case was not removable because the requisite jurisdictional amount in a diversity of citizenship case had not been claimed by plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
At a pretrial conference in state court held on April 12, 1993, plaintiff was granted leave to amend his claim to $75,000, and on April 22, 1993, defendants filed their notice of removal of the case to this court. Defendants assert that the removal clock did not begin to run until the pretrial conference amendment of April 12, 1993.
Plaintiff contends that defendants' notice of removal was untimely because the defendants knew that the claim of plaintiff exceeded $50,000 as early as September 28, 1992, when plaintiff served interrogatory answers which itemized his damages at $52,771.68. Plaintiff contends that the defendants gained further knowledge that his claim exceeded $50,000 on November 25, 1992, when his deposition was taken and he stated that he wanted to change his claim to more than $52,000.
Plaintiff argues that under these facts the defendants did not meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) which provides that a notice of removal must be filed within 30 days after receipt of an amended pleading, motion or "other paper" from which it may be ascertained that the case has become removable. The court agrees.
I conclude that the case became removable on September 28, 1992, when plaintiff served his interrogatory answers, and the defendants had 30 days from that date within which to file their notice of removal.
It is well settled that interrogatory answers may...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Webster v. DOW UNITED TECH. COMPOSITE PRODUCTS, Civil Action No. 96-A-132-N.
...Chapman v. Powermatic Inc., 969 F.2d 160 (5th Cir.1992); Ellis v. Logan Co., 543 F.Supp. 586 (W.D.Ky. 1982); Van Gosen v. Arcadian Motor Carriers, 825 F.Supp. 981 (D.Kan.1993). As a general principle, the removal statutes are to be construed narrowly. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313......
-
Jackson v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.
...responses unquestionably may constitute such "other paper," as a number of courts have held, see, e.g., Van Gosen v. Arcadian Motor Carriers, 825 F.Supp. 981 (D.Kan. 1993); plaintiffs do not dispute this point. Yet plaintiffs maintain that because the responses were unsigned and unfiled, th......
-
McLain v. American Intern. Recovery
...2. See also, Jackson v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Mut. Inc. Co., 947 F.Supp. 252, 254 (S.D.Miss. 1996), (citing Van Gosen v. Arcadian Motor Carriers, 825 F.Supp. 981 (D.Kan.1993)). In addition, the case may become removable if a defense attorney receives anything tangible in writing such as a......
-
Whitaker v. Heinrich Schepers Gmbh & Co. Kg, Record No. 071197.
...676, 678 (E.D.Va.2004); Lien v. H.E.R.C. Prods., Inc., 8 F.Supp.2d 531, 534 (E.D.Va.1998); see also Van Gosen v. Arcadian Motor Carriers, 825 F.Supp. 981, 982 (D.Kan.1993) (answers to interrogatories can constitute an "other paper" under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) giving notice that a state court ......
-
Amount in controversy and removal: current trends and strategic considerations.
...Inc., 684 F.Supp. 393, 394-95. (D. Del. 1988) (utterances from counsel and statements made in court constituted "other paper"). [23.] 825 F.Supp. 981 D. Kan. 1993). [24.] See also Roberson v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 770 F.Supp. 1324 (N.D. Ind. 1991). [25.] 843 F.Supp. 424 (N.D. Ill. 1994).......