Van Norman v. Barney

CourtMississippi Supreme Court
CitationVan Norman v. Barney, 199 Miss. 581, 24 So.2d 866 (Miss. 1946)
Decision Date25 February 1946
Docket Number36035.
PartiesVAN NORMAN v. BARNEY.

F. D. Hewitt, of McComb, for appellant.

Gordon & Gordon, of Liberty, for appellee.

ROBERDS Justice.

This appeal involves the correctness of the action of the Chancellor in refusing to confirm in appellant a sale of lands of Hillery Barney, an alleged non compos mentis, made at the instance of a guardian of said lands.

The question arises under these circumstances: At a sale made April 28, 1945, appellant was the highest bidder at $1,990, which he paid to the special commissioner making the sale. The Chancellor declined to approve this sale because it became known to him that the land was not correctly described in the petition for the sale and in the advertisement. The petition was amended and the description corrected and another sale ordered.

The second sale took place May 5, 1945, and J. I. Poole was the highest bidder at $2,560. The Chancellor refused to approve this sale because the time elapsing between the date of the advertisement and the date of the sale was less than that required by the decree and the law. Another sale was ordered.

The third sale was had June 22, 1945, at which J. I. Poole was the highest bidder at $2,280. The Chancellor conformed that sale.

It appears that appellant bid at the second and third sales. He also filed in the cause a written protest against confirmation of the sale to Poole, insisting that the first sale be confirmed to him.

Both...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Gamma Healthcare Inc. v. Estate of Grantham
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 3, 2022
    ...rel. Patterson ], 242 Miss. 547, 135 So. 2d 703 (1961) ; McLendon v. Laird , 211 Miss. 662, 52 So. 2d 497 (1951) ; Van Norman v. Barney , 199 Miss. 581, 24 So. 2d 866 (1946). Allred v. Webb , 641 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Miss. 1994) (quoting Monaghan v. Blue Bell, Inc. , 393 So. 2d 466, 466-67 (M......
  • Insured Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. State ex rel. Patterson
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1961
    ...pass upon. The Supreme Court has no power to render advisory opinions. McLendon v. Laird, 211 Miss. 662, 52 So.2d 497; Van Norman v. Barney, 199 Miss. 581, 24 So.2d 866, 25 So.2d 324; Shelton et al. v. Ladner, Secretary of State et al., 205 Miss. 264, 38 So.2d 718; Gipson v. State, 203 Miss......
  • Allred v. Webb, 91-CA-00750
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • August 18, 1994
    ...Association v. State, 242 Miss. 547, 135 So.2d 703 (1961); McLendon v. Laird, 211 Miss. 662, 52 So.2d 497 (1951); Van Norman v. Barney, 199 Miss. 581, 24 So.2d 866 (1946). This Court will not adjudicate moot questions. Bradley v. State, 355 So.2d 675 (Miss.1978); Stevens Enterprises, Inc. v......
  • Stevenson v. Stevenson, 90-CA-0236
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • April 17, 1991
    ...a de novo review of the chancellor's finding." Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Sklar, 555 So.2d 1024, 1028 (Miss.1990). Van Norman v. Barney, 199 Miss. 581, 24 So.2d 866 (1946), addressed the question which has been raised in the present appeal. The appellant entered the highest bid at a judic......
  • Get Started for Free