Van Reen v. Aetna Life Ins Co.

Decision Date09 December 1913
Citation209 F. 691
PartiesVAN REEN v. AETNA LIFE INS. CO.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of New Jersey

Herbert H. Gibbs, of New York City, for complainant.

Collins & Corbin, of Jersey City, N.J., for defendant.

BRADFORD District Judge.

The bill in this case was filed by Jacob Van Reen, a judgment creditor of Charles Brogan, against the AEtna Life Insurance Company, for the specific performance, as claimed by Van Reen, of the provisions of an automobile liability policy issued by the insurance company to Brogan on or about April 8, 1910, in consideration of the payment by the latter of a premium of $99. While Brogan held the policy and it continued in full force Van Reen while traveling on a highway in New Jersey suffered serious accidental bodily injuries August 7 1910, through the negligent and careless use by Brogan of the automobile referred to in the policy. Van Reen brought an action in the Supreme Court of New York for damages for the injuries so received and recovered judgment against Brogan in the sum of $20,000 as damages, and $143.12 as costs of suit. Execution against Brogan was issued on the above judgment and returned unsatisfied prior to the commencement of this suit. The insurance company at its own cost undertook the defense of the New York action in the name and on behalf of Brogan from its commencement until and including the trial, and during the pendency of the action negotiated with Van Reen for a settlement of his claim, but did not pay or settle the same or any part of it. The insurance company was and is familiar with the proceedings in the New York action and had notice of the entry of judgment and the issuance and return of the execution and that such judgment is wholly unpaid. The policy in question provides, among other things, for the payment of the maximum sum of $5,000 in case of accident resulting in bodily injuries or death to only one person, and also all costs taxed against the assured in any legal proceeding defended by the insurance company, and also all interest accruing after the entry of judgment therein, computed on the amount of the insurance which shall have become payable under the provisions of the policy. Condition M of the policy sets forth the measure of the indemnity which should become due from the insurance company, as follows:

'M. The Company's liability for loss on account of an accident resulting in bodily injuries and/or death to one person is limited to five thousand dollars ($5,000); and subject to the same limit for each person, the Company's total liability for loss on account of any one accident resulting in bodily injuries and/or death to more than one person is limited to Ten thousand dollars ($10,000). The Company will, however, as provided in Conditions B and C hereof, pay the expense of litigation in addition to the sum herein limited, and will also pay all costs taxed against the Assured in any legal proceeding defended by the Company, and interest accruing after entry of judgment upon such part thereof as shall not be in excess of the limits of the Company's liability herein expressed.'

Conditions B and C are as follows:

'B. If suit is brought against the Assured to enforce a claim for damages covered by this policy he shall immediately forward to the Company every summons or other process as soon as the same shall have been served on him, and the Company will, at its own cost, defend such suit in the name of and on behalf of the Assured.

C. The Assured, whenever requested by the Company, shall aid in effecting settlements, securing information and evidence, the attendance of witnesses and in prosecuting appeals, but the Assured shall not voluntarily assume any liability or interfere in any negotiation for settlement, or in any legal proceeding, or incur any expense, or settle any claim, except at his own cost, without the written consent of the Company previously given except that the Assured may provide at the Company's expense such immediate surgical relief as is imperative at the time of the accident.'

Van Reen seeks in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Wehrhahn v. Ft. Dearborn Casualty Underwriters of Chicago, Ill.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 1928
    ... ... Bull Dog Auto Fire Ins. Assn., 267 S.W ... 39; Conqueror Zinc & Lead Co. v. Aetna Life Ins Co., ... 133 S.W. 156; Van Reen v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., ... 209 F. 691; Aetna ... ...
  • TUBIZE CHATILLON CORPORATION v. White Transp. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • May 16, 1935
    ...harmonized with the general trend of authorities which seems to be distinctly the other way. 36 C. J. p. 1129, § 129; Van Reen v. Ætna Life Ins. Co. (D. C.) 209 F. 691; 8 Couch, Ency. Ins. Law, § 1982; Vol. 5, § 1175 (d); In re Harrington Motor Co., Ltd. (Eng. Ct. App.) 1928 I Ch. 105, 59 A......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT