Varsity Contractors and Home Ins. Co. v. Baca

Decision Date13 June 1985
Docket NumberNo. 84CA0498,84CA0498
Citation709 P.2d 55
PartiesVARSITY CONTRACTORS AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioners, v. Mike L. BACA and John J. McDonald, as members of the Industrial Commission of the State of Colorado, and the Industrial Commission of the State of Colorado, Charles McGrath, Director of the Division of Labor, and Theodore Smith, Respondents. . III
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Stokes v. Denver Newspaper Agency, Llp
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 2006
    ...of equipment devoted to the employer's purpose," thus making the vehicle "part of the work environment"); Varsity Contractors & Home Ins. Co. v. Baca, 709 P.2d 55 (Colo.App.1985)(employer's requirement that employee bring car to work in order to do the job "conferred an added benefit" to th......
  • Archer v. Cook, Civil Action 21-cv-02649-RM-NRN
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • June 7, 2022
    ... ... If this employee can work from ... home, they may do so with your approval. This employee may ... Louis ... Baptist Temple, Inc. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. , 605 ... F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir. 1979); ... established. Puller v. Baca , 781 F.3d 1190, 1196 ... (10th Cir. 2015). Failure ... (Colo.App. 1988); Varsity Contractors and Home Ins. Co ... v. Baca , 709 P.2d ... ...
  • Archer v. Cook
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • June 7, 2022
    ...322; Whale Commc'ns v. Claimants in re Death of Osborn, 759 P.2d 848, 848 (Colo.App. 1988); Varsity Contractors and Home Ins. Co. v. Baca, 709 P.2d 55, 56 (Colo.App. 1985), and whether the action “was required in order to pursue [the defendant's] employer's business.” Capra, 857 P.2d at 134......
  • Maryland Cas. Co. v. Messina
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • May 16, 1994
    ...is at the express or implied request of the employer, then the travel is within the scope of employment. Varsity Contractors and Home Ins. Co. v. Baca, 709 P.2d 55 (Colo.App.1985). Further, if an employer provides transportation to its employee or pays the employee's cost of commuting to an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT