Vashone-Caruso v. Suthers, 00CA1561.
Decision Date | 07 June 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 00CA1561.,00CA1561. |
Citation | 29 P.3d 339 |
Parties | Ronald A. VASHONE-CARUSO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John SUTHERS, in his official capacity as the executive director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
People ex rel. T.B.
...P.3d 1165. That doctrine applies "to the decisions of an equal court or a different division of the same court." Vashone-Caruso v. Suthers , 29 P.3d 339, 342 (Colo. App. 2001). Thus, the juvenile court could've denied T.B.’s second petition on this basis alone. But because no other division......
-
Saint John's Church in the Wilderness v. Scott
...conditions or law, or legal or factual error, or if the prior decision would result in manifest injustice.” 3Vashone–Caruso v. Suthers, 29 P.3d 339, 342 (Colo.App.2001); see Mitchell v. Ryder, 104 P.3d 316, 323 (Colo.App.2004).B. Analysis1. Change in Controlling Law ¶ 10 Defendants argue th......
-
Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.
...conditions or law, or legal or factual error, or if the prior decision would result in manifest injustice.” Vashone–Caruso v. Suthers, 29 P.3d 339, 342 (Colo.App.2001); accord Saint John's Church in the Wilderness v. Scott, 2012 COA 72, ¶ 9, 296 P.3d 273;see also Giampapa, 64 P.3d at 243. ¶......
-
Bradshaw v. CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DIST.
...Due process is a flexible standard, but at a minimum, it requires notice and a fair opportunity to be heard. Vashone-Caruso v. Suthers, 29 P.3d 339 (Colo.App.2001). Here, the record does not contain a transcript of the admission appeals committee's meeting. In moving for summary judgment, h......
Request a trial to view additional results