Vaughn v. DANIELS COMPANY (WEST VIRGINIA) INC., 14A01-0111-CV-408.
| Decision Date | 10 February 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 14A01-0111-CV-408.,14A01-0111-CV-408. |
| Parties | Stephen L. and Melinda VAUGHN, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. DANIELS COMPANY (WEST VIRGINIA) INC., and Solar Sources, Inc., Appellees-Defendants. |
| Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
J. Kevin King, Cline King & King, P.C., Columbus, IN, Attorney for Appellants.
Jeffrey W. Ahlers, Todd C. Barsumian, Kahn Dees, Donovan & Kahn, Evansville, IN, Attorneys for Appellee, Daniels Company (West Virginia), Inc.
R. Steven Johnson, Sacopulos Johnson & Sacopulos, Terre Haute, IN, Attorney for Appellee, Solar Sources, Inc.
We have granted rehearing in Vaughn v. Daniels, 777 N.E.2d 1110 (Ind.Ct.App. 2002), for the limited purpose of clarifying Chief Judge Brook's dissent, in which he disagreed with "the majority's conclusion that Vaughn may proceed against [Daniels Company (West Virginia), Inc. and Solar Sources, Inc.] under the Indiana Products Liability Act." Id. at 1139-40; see also id. at 1141 (). Given that Vaughn did not maintain an action against Solar under the Act, any mention in Chief Judge Brook's dissent of Solar's liability under the Act should be disregarded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Coffman v. PSI Energy, Inc.
...exceptions apply to the facts presented. Vaughn v. Daniels Co., 777 N.E.2d 1110, 1133 (Ind.Ct.App.2002),clarified on reh'g, 782 N.E.2d 1062 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). The exceptions are: (1) where the contract requires the performance of intrinsically dangerous work; (2) where the principal is by l......
-
Seeley v. State
... ... Pharmaceuticals, Division of Body Dynamics, Inc., 803 So.2d 68 (La.Ct. App.2001) ... ...
-
Baker v. Heye-America
...See also Vaughn v. Daniels Co. (West Virginia), Inc., 777 N.E.2d 1110, 1128 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), decision clar'd on reh'g 782 N.E.2d 1062 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (stating statutory Accordingly, under the IPLA, the plaintiff must prove that the product was in a defective condition that rendered it u......
-
Kelly v. Levandoski
...(Ind.Ct. App.2002) (internal quotations and citations omitted), transfer pending, clarified on reh'g on unrelated matter 782 N.E.2d 1062 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). The first three topics about which Kelly wished Braje to testify were: (1) the elements of a contract; (2) case law regarding contracts......