Veazie v. Columbia & N. R. R. Co.
Decision Date | 08 April 1924 |
Citation | 224 P. 1094,111 Or. 1 |
Parties | VEAZIE ET AL. v. COLUMBIA & N. R. R. CO. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Department 2.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; J. P. Kavanaugh, Judge.
Action by A. L. Veazie and others against the Columbia & Nehalem River Railway Company. From an order allowing plaintiffs a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court allowing plaintiffs a new trial in an action brought by them to recover attorney's fees. The complaint alleged that $20,000 was the reasonable value of the services rendered and the defendant admitted an indebtedness in the sum of $2,500 and tendered that sum to the plaintiffs. The facts upon which the new trial was granted are concisely stated in a memorandum made by the trial judge, which we here reproduce:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Ladd
... ... Marshfield, 89 Or. 401, 174 P. 138; Duniway v. Hadley, 91 Or. 343, 178 P. 942; Veazie v. Columbia, etc., R. R. Co., 111 Or. 1, 224 P. 1094. It is obvious that we cannot logically hold that we have the right, when no error has been ... ...
-
State v. Ramoz
...v. Herman , [213 Or. 140, 322 P.2d 119 (1958)], State v. Bosch , 139 Or. 150, 154, 7 P.2d 554 [(1932)] ; Veazie [et al. ] v. Columbia [etc. R.R. Co. ], 111 Or. 1, 224 P. 1094 (1924) ], yet the rule is that when a party having knowledge of an error or an irregularity during the trial fails t......
-
Van Lom v. Schneiderman
...court, or abuse of discretion, by which such party was prevented from having a fair trial;" In the case of Veazie et al. v. Columbia & Nehalem River R.R. Co., 111 Or. 1, 224 P. 1094, it was held that Article VII, Section 3 has made no change in that subsection of the statute. Subsection 1 i......
-
Strandholm v. General Const. Co.
...conflict with the majority opinion in the Fischer case. One of the more interesting cases on this subject is Veazie et al. v. Columbia, etc., R. R. Co., 1924, 111 Or. 1, 224 P. 1094. The opinion by Chief Justice McBride, quotes from a memorandum made by the trial judge. The latter relates '......