Venetian Cove Club, Inc. v. Venetian Bay Developers, Inc.
Decision Date | 08 January 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 81-609,81-609 |
Citation | 411 So.2d 1323 |
Parties | VENETIAN COVE CLUB, INC., a Florida corporation, and Herbert A. Elliott, Appellants, v. VENETIAN BAY DEVELOPERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Nelson A. Faerber andNile M. Marriott, Jr., Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Donald T. Franke of Franke & Bryant, P. A., Naples, for appellants.
Nelson A. Faerber, Jr., Naples, for appellees.
Appellants, Venetian Cove Club, Inc., a condominium association, and Herbert A. Elliott, a unit owner, challenge the trial court's order assessing attorney's fees in favor of appellees.We reverse.
Appellant, a condominium association, leases the parking and recreation areas associated with the condominium from the appellees.In January 1979appellants filed suit against the architect, engineer, general contractor, and developer of the condominium seeking damages for alleged construction defects.In June appellants moved the court, pursuant to section 718.401(4), Florida Statutes(1977), to enter an order authorizing them to pay rent to appellees into the registry of the court pending the outcome of the litigation.Over the objection of appellees, the trial court granted the motion and entered an order requiring the condominium association to make payments into an interest-bearing account, as stipulated by the parties, in lieu of the court registry.Appellees took an interlocutory appeal to the supreme court challenging the constitutionality of section 718.401(4).On November 15, 1979, the supreme court declared the statute unconstitutional in Pomponio v. Claridge of Pompano Condominium, 378 So.2d 774(Fla.1980).On the authority of Pomponio the supreme court reversed the trial court's order, Marriott v. Venetian Cove Club, Inc., No. 57,438(Fla., July 10, 1980), after which the association released the rental payments to the appellees.
Appellees then moved to assess attorney's fees against appellants for the fees they incurred in obtaining direct payment of the rent.The trial court granted the motion and entered an order on January 9, 1981, assessing a fee of $10,000, the amount requested by appellees.
Appellees cited two contractual provisions as the basis for the award of fees.Section 12.2 of the Declaration of Condominium provides:
12.2 Costs and Attorney's Fees.In any proceeding arising because of an alleged failure of an apartment owner or the Association to comply with the terms of the Declaration of Condominium, Articles of Incorporation of the Association, the By-Laws or the regulations adopted pursuant to them, and the documents and regulations as they may be amended from time to time, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover the costs of proceeding and such reasonable attorney's fees as may be awarded by the court.
Paragraph 11(f) of the Lease Agreement between the parties states:
It is further understood that lessee will pay in addition to the fees and other sums agreed to be paid hereunder, such additional sums as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney's fees in any suit or action instituted by lessor to enforce the provisions of this lease or...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Sholkoff v. Boca Raton Community Hosp., Inc.
...4th DCA 1980). In addition, contractual attorneys' fees provisions must be construed strictly. Venetian Cove [Club, Inc. v. Venetian Bay Developers, Inc., 411 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) ]. In Venetian Cove it was held that such a clause was 'only intended to provide for the recovery of a......
-
Wendel v. Wendel
...construed. See Pici v. First Union Nat'l Bank of Fla., 705 So.2d 50, 51 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Venetian Cove Club, Inc. v. Venetian Bay Developers, Inc., 411 So.2d 1323, 1324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Here, a strict construction of paragraph XIV precludes any award of attorney's fees because fees ar......
-
Air Turbine Tech., Inc. v. Quarles & Brady, LLC
...277, 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ); Williams v. Williams, 892 So.2d 1154, 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ; Venetian Cove Club, Inc. v. Venetian Bay Developers, Inc., 411 So.2d 1323, 1324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Strict construction of the “legal costs and expenses” provision in the Private Brand Agreement p......
-
Burnett v. Brito
...Fairways Royale Association, Inc. v. Hasam Realty, Corp., 428 So.2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Venetian Cove Club, Inc. v. Venetian Bay Developers, Inc., 411 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); see Ohio Realty Investment Corp. v. Southern Bank of West Palm Beach, 300 So.2d 679 (Fla.1974), we find ......