Venkatesan v. New York

Decision Date02 October 2006
Docket NumberNo. 05-11405.,05-11405.
Citation127 S.Ct. 126,549 U.S. 854,166 L.Ed.2d 94,75 USLW 3167
PartiesSharon L. VENKATESAN, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Case below, 295 A.D.2d 635, 743 N.Y.S.2d 615.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Terry
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 8, 2021
    ...v. Venkatesan, 295 A.D.2d 635, 636, 743 N.Y.S.2d 615 [2002], lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 565, 754 N.Y.S.2d 218, 784 N.E.2d 91 [2002], cert denied 549 U.S. 854, 127 S.Ct. 126, 166 L.Ed.2d 94 [2006] ). As relevant here, "[a] person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime when, with intent to commit......
  • People v. Harris
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 12, 2015
    ...see People v. Venkatesan, 295 A.D.2d 635, 637, 743 N.Y.S.2d 615, lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 565, 754 N.Y.S.2d 218, 784 N.E.2d 91, cert. denied 549 U.S. 854, 127 S.Ct. 126, 166 L.Ed.2d 94 ). We do not address defendant's remaining challenge to the effectiveness of counsel because it “is raised for......
  • People v. Stahl
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 21, 2016
    ...295 A.D.2d 635, 637–638, 743 N.Y.S.2d 615 [2002], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 565, 754 N.Y.S.2d 218, 784 N.E.2d 91 [2002], cert. denied 549 U.S. 854, 127 S.Ct. 126, 166 L.Ed.2d 94 [2006] ). Finally, defendant's waiver of his right to a jury trial is no less knowing, voluntary or intelligent even i......
  • People v. Bank, 461 KA 09-00607
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 12, 2015
    ...(People v. Venkatesan, 295 A.D.2d 635, 637, 743 N.Y.S.2d 615, lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 565, 754 N.Y.S.2d 218, 784 N.E.2d 91, cert. denied 549 U.S. 854, 127 S.Ct. 126, 166 L.Ed.2d 94 ), all of whom opined that defendant was acting under the influence of a crack cocaine binge rather than a phase ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT