Vestal v. Hoffa, 71-1472.
Decision Date | 03 December 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 71-1472.,71-1472. |
Citation | 451 F.2d 706 |
Parties | Don VESTAL et al., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. James R. HOFFA et al., Defendant-Appellants. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, etc., et al., Plaintiff-Appellants, v. Don VESTAL et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., for James R. Hoffa and others; Goldberg, Previant & Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., Raymond W. Bergan, Williams, Connolly & Califano, Washington, D.C., Cecil D. Branstetter, Branstetter, Moody & Kilgore, Nashville, Tenn., Ian Lanoff, Washington, D.C., on brief.
Edward C. White, Nashville, Tenn., for Don Vestal and others.
Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges.
The sole question in this appeal is whether General President James R. Hoffa had the right under the Constitution of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America to delegate authority to General Vice President Frank E. Fitzsimmons to impose a trusteeship over its Local Union 327 of Nashville, Tennessee.
The District Court, 329 F.Supp. 801, construing the constitution of the International Union, held that only the General President had that authority and that it was non-delegable. The District Court entered an order enjoining the continuation of the trusteeship imposed by General Vice President Fitzsimmons over the local union. The International appealed. We reverse.
The power and authority of the General President to appoint trustees for local unions was provided for in Art. VI Sec. 5 of the Constitution adopted at the International Convention held in July, 1966. The pertinent part is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Conway v. International Ass'n of Insul. & Asbes.
...their own judgment for that of a union official's in the interpretation of a union's Constitution and Bylaws. Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706, 709 (6th Cir.1971). Instead, courts should observe the "well-established, soundly based policy of avoiding unnecessary judicial intrusion into the aff......
-
Stelling v. International Broth. of Elec. Workers Local Union No. 1547
...The Fiduciary Duty Under Section 501 of the LMRDA, 75 Col.L.R. 1188, 1204-05 (1975). Nevertheless, the court in Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706, 709 (6th Cir. 1971), Cert. denied, 406 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 1768, 32 L.Ed.2d 135 (1972), Courts are reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of......
-
Casumpang v. Ilwu Local 142
...is not fair or reasonable." Stelling v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 587 F.2d 1379, 1388 (9th Cir.1978) (quoting Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706, 709 (6th Cir.1971)); see also Busch v. Givens, 627 F.2d 978, 981 (9th Cir.1980); Gordon v. Laborers' Int'l Union, 490 F.2d 133, 137 (10th As previo......
-
Parker Drilling Co. v. Metlakatla Indian Community
...with the Metlakatlans' prior construction, is quite reasonable, and should not be interfered with by the Court. Cf. Vestal v. Hoffa, 451 F.2d 706, 709 (6th Cir. 1971).10 As the court has concluded that the § 16 entity as well as the § 17 corporation11 had the power to lease the Airport the ......