Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board

Decision Date26 April 1965
Docket NumberNo. 65,65
Citation85 S.Ct. 1153,380 U.S. 513,14 L.Ed.2d 46
PartiesVETERANS OF the ABRAHAM LINCOLN BRIGADE, Petitioner, v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Leonard B. Boudin, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Kevin T. Maroney and Bruce J. Terris, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner was ordered by the Subversive Activities Control Board to register as a Communist-front organization under § 7 of the Subversive Acitvities Control Act of 1950, as amended, 64 Stat. 993, 50 U.S.C. § 786 (1958 ed.), and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed. 117 U.S.App.D.C. 404, 331 F.2d 64. We granted certiorari, 377 U.S. 989, 84 S.Ct. 1916, 12 L.Ed.2d 1043. In this case, the order to register was based almost exclusively on events before 1950, and very largely on events before 1940. The hearings themselves were concluded in November 1954, more than 10 years ago. On so stale a record we do not think it is either necessary or appropriate that we decide the serious constitutional questions raised by the order. See American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 380 U.S. 503, 85 S.Ct. 1148. The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Judgment vacated and cause remanded.

Mr. Justice WHITE took no part in the decision of this case.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice HARLAN concur, dissenting.

I think this case is ripe for decision. The controversy is real, not feigned. All of the relevant facts one needs to know to resolve the constitutional question are exposed in the present record.

This is the famous brigade of Americans who fought in the Spanish Civil War against Franco. Approximately 3,000 American youths were members; and of these only about 1,800 survived. Petitioner was formed in 1939 as an unincorporated association and was incorporated in 1940 under the laws of New York, its charter being forfeited in 1952 for failure to file required reports.

The record is detailed. The Court of Appeals, which sustained the Subversive Activities Control Board in finding that petitioner is a 'Communist-front organization' within the meaning of § 3(4) of the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, as amended, 64 Stat. 989, 50 U.S.C. § 782(4) (117 U.S.App.D.C. 404, 331 F.2d 64), spoke of 'the tremendous volume of the record' and the 'almost numberless facets of fact involved.' Id., at 413, 331 F.2d, at 73. The history of the formation of the Brigade, its relationship with the Communist Party and with Communists, the manner in which international brigades of this kind were employed by Communists, the role of Communists in forming this Brigade, the affiliations of officers of the Brigade, the ideas and program promoted by the Brigade's official organ, Volunteer for Liberty, the efforts of the Brigade to get its members employed in unions, offices, or factories where a Communist unit or functionary was located, the extent to which the Brigade responded to Party discipline, and the extent to which the Brigade aided and supported the Party—all were fully explored.

Since 1950 the Brigade's affairs have been run almost entirely by an Executive Secretary and a National Commander. Since 1950 its activities have consisted principally of social affairs, rehabilitating and resettling veterans and getting them employment, making statements in opposition to the Franco regime, supporting its members who were indicted under the Smith Act, and defending itself in this proceeding.

This proceeding started in 1953, when the Attorney General petitioned the Board for an order requiring the Brigade to register as a Communist-front organization. Hearings before the Board commenced May 3, 1954, and ended November 16, 1954. Over a year later the Board issued a registration order against the Brigade, and its report in the case. The final order of the Board is dated December 21, 1955. The opinion of the Court of Appeals comes eight years later* and is dated December 17, 1963.

But no one suggests that there have been any basic changes in the pattern of the Brigade's activities either since the Board's order or the Court's judgment. The Court of Appeals found no difficulty in concluding that as of the date of the record...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Blawis v. Bolin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • May 8, 1973
    ...Comm. for Prot. of Foreign Born v. SACB, 380 U.S. 503, 85 S.Ct. 1148, 14 L.Ed.2d 39 (1965); Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. SACB, 380 U.S. 513, 85 S.Ct. 1153, 14 L.Ed.2d 46 (1965). Second, the orders of the Board have not yet been validated, over 10 years after the Supreme Court uphe......
  • Communist Party of United States v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • March 3, 1967
    ...for Protection of Foreign Born v. SACB, 380 U.S. 503, 85 S.Ct. 1148, 14 L.Ed.2d 39 (1965); Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. SACB, 380 U.S. 513, 85 S.Ct. 1153, 14 L.Ed.2d 46 (1965). In each case Justices Douglas, Black, and Harlan were of the view that the constitutional issues sho......
  • Bois Clubs of America v. Clark
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 11, 1967
    ...Committee for Protection of Foreign Born v. SACB, 380 U.S. 503, 85 S.Ct. 1148, 14 L.Ed.2d 39; Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. SACB, 380 U.S. 513, 85 S.Ct. 1153, 14 L.Ed.2d 46. Similarly, the District Court should not be forced to decide these constitutional questions in a Appella......
  • Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COM'N
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • June 30, 1965
    ...687, 691 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 908, 85 S. Ct. 890, 13 L.Ed.2d 796 (1965). Compare Veterans of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. S. A. C. B., 380 U.S. 513, 85 S.Ct. 1153, 14 L.Ed.2d 46 (1965). 8 See generally, 3 DAVIS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW § 20.06 (1958). See also United States v. L. A. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT