Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.

CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
Writing for the CourtJOSÉ A. CABRANES
CitationViacom Int'l, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc., 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1283, 676 F.3d 19, 2012 Copr.L.Dec. P 30231 (2nd Cir. 2012)
Decision Date05 April 2012
Docket NumberDocket Nos. 10–3270–cv,10–3342–cv.
PartiesVIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Comedy Partners, Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Black Entertainment Television, LLC, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. YOUTUBE, INC., YouTube, LLC, Google, Inc., Defendants–Appellees.The Football Association Premier League Limited, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bourne Co., Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc., X–Ray Dog Music, Inc., Fédération Française De Tennis, Murbo Music Publishing, Inc., Stage Three Music (US), Inc., Plaintiffs–Appellants,Robert Tur, d/b/a Los Angeles News Service, The Scottish Premier League Limited, The Music Force Media Group LLC, The Music Force, LLC, Sin–Drome Records, Ltd., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, National Music Publishers' Association, The Rodgers & Hammerstein Organization, Edward B. Marks Music Company, Freddy Bienstock Music Company, d/b/a Bienstock Publishing Company, Alley Music Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC, Google, Inc., Defendants–Appellees.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Paul M. Smith, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC (William M. Hohengarten, Scott B. Wilkens, Matthew S. Hellman, and Susan J. Kohlmann, Jenner & Block LLP, New York, NY, and Washington, DC; Theodore B. Olson and Matthew D. McGill, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC; Stuart J. Baskin, Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, NY, on the brief), for PlaintiffsAppellants Viacom International, Inc., et al.

Charles S. Sims, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, N.Y. (William M. Hart, Noah Siskind Gitterman, and Elizabeth A. Figueira, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, on the brief), for PlaintiffsAppellants Football Association Premier League Ltd., et al.; Max W. Berger and John C. Browne, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, for PlaintiffsAppellants Football Association Premier League Ltd., Bourne Co., Murbo Music Publishing, Inc., Cherry Lane Music Publishing Co., Inc., X–Ray Dog Music, Inc., and Fédération Française de Tennis; Louis M. Solomon and Hal S. Shaftel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, for PlaintiffAppellant Football Association Premier League Ltd.; Jacqueline C. Charlesworth and Cindy P. Abramson, Morrison & Foerster, New York, NY, and David S. Stellings and Annika K. Martin, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, for PlaintiffAppellant Stage Three Music (US), Inc., and PlaintiffsAppellants National Music Publishers' Association, Rodgers & Hammerstein Organization, Edward B. Marks Music Co., Freddy Bienstock Music Co. d/b/a Bienstock Publishing Co., and Alley Music Corporation; Daniel Girard and Christina Connolly Sharp, Girard Gibbs LLP, San Francisco, CA, David Garrison, Barrett Johnston & Parsley, Nashville, TN, and Kevin Doherty, Burr & Forman LLP, Nashville, TN, on the brief, for PlaintiffAppellant Cal IV Entertainment LLC; Christopher Lovell and Christopher M. McGrath, Lovell Stewart Halebian LLP, New York, NY, Jeffrey L. Graubart, Pasadena, CA, and Steve D'Onofrio, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs The Music Force Media Group LLC, The Music Force, LLC, and Sin–Drome Records, Ltd.

Andrew H. Schapiro, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, N.Y. (A. John P. Mancini and Brian M. Willen, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY; David H. Kramer, Michael H. Rubin, and Bart E. Volkmer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, on the brief), for DefendantsAppellees.Clifford M. Sloan (Christopher G. Clark and Mary E. Rasenberger, on the brief), Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY, and Washington, DC, for amici curiae Advance Publications, Inc., Association of American Publishers, Association of American University Presses, The Associated Press, The Center for the Rule of Law, Gannett Co., Inc., ICBC Broadcast Holdings, Inc., Institute for Policy Innovation, The Ladies Professional Golf Association, The McClatchy Co., The Media Institute, Minority Media & Telecommunications Council, Inc., National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters, The National Football League, Newspaper Association of America, Picture Archive Council of America, Professional Photographers of America, Radio Television Digital News Association, Rosetta Stone Ltd., The E.W. Scripps Co., Sports Rights Owners Coalition, The Washington Post, and Zuffa LLC, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Peter D. DeChiara, Cohen, Weiss & Simon LLP, New York, NY, for amici curiae American Federation of Musicians, American Federation of Television & Radio Artists, Directors Guild of America, Inc., International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Screen Actors Guild, Inc., and Studio Transportation Drivers, Local 399, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Russell J. Frackman, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for amici curiae Broadcast Music, Inc., American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, SESAC, Inc., The Society of Composers and Lyricists, The Association of Independent Music Publishers, Songwriters Guild of America, The Recording Academy, The Nashville Songwriters Association International, American Association of Independent Music, Music Publishers' Association of the United States, Lisa Thomas Music Services, LLC, Garth Brooks, Bruce Hornsby, Boz Scaggs, Sting, Roger Waters, Glenn Frey, Don Henley, Timothy B. Schmit, and Joe Walsh (The Eagles), in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Carey R. Ramos (Lynn B. Bayard and Darren W. Johnson, on the brief), Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY, for amici curiae Stuart N. Brotman, Ronald A. Cass, and Raymond T. Nimmer, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Jonathan L. Marcus (Martin F. Hansen, Matthew Berns, Brian D. Ginsberg & Evan R. Cox, on the brief), Covington & Burling LLP, New York, NY, San Francisco, CA, and Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Business Software Alliance, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Robert Penchina, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, L.L.P., New York, NY, for amicus curiae CBS Corp., in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Bruce A. Lehman (Jason D. Koch and Cameron Coffey, on the brief), Washington, DC, for amicus curiae International Intellectual Property Institute, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Bruce E. Boyden, Marquette University Law School, Milwaukee, WI, for amici curiae Intellectual Property Law Professors, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Gregory G. Garre, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC (Lori Alvino McGill, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, Thomas W. Burt, Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, and Jacob Schatz, Electronic Arts Inc., Redwood City, CA, on the brief), for amicus curiae Microsoft Corp. & Electronic Arts Inc., in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Kelly M. Klaus, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA (Susan Cleary, Independent Film & Television Alliance, on the brief) for amicus curiae Motion Picture Association of America, Independent Film & Television Alliance, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Richard B. Kendall (Laura W. Brill and Joshua Y. Karp, on the brief), Kendall Brill & Klieger LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for amici curiae Matthew L. Spitzer, John R. Allison, Robert G. Bone, Hugh C. Hansen, Michael S. Knoll, Reinier H. Kraakman, Alan Schwartz, and Robert E. Scott, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Andrew M. Riddles, Crowell & Moring LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael J. Songer, Crowell & Moring LLP, Washington, DC, and Daniel J. Popeo and Cory L. Andrews, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, DC, on the brief), for amicus curiae Washington Legal Foundation, in support of PlaintiffsAppellants.Ron Lazebnik, Lincoln Square Legal Services, Inc., New York, NY, for amici curiae Anaheim Ballet, Michael Moore, Khan Academy Inc., Adam Bahner, Michael Bassik, Dane Boedigheimer, Matthew Brown, Michael Buckley, Shay Butler, Charles Como, Iman Crosson, Philip De Vellis, Rawn Erickson, Hank Green, John Green, Kassem Gharaibeh, William Louis Hyde, Kevin Nalty, Allison Speed, Charles Todd, Charles Trippy, and Barnett Zitron, in support of DefendantsAppellees.Seth D. Greenstein, Constantine Cannon LLP, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Professor Michael Carrier, in support of DefendantsAppellees.Jonathan Band, Washington, DC (Markham C. Erickson, Holch & Erickson LLP, Washington, DC, and Matthew Schruers, Computer & Communications Industry Association, Washington, DC, on the brief), for amici curiae Computer & Communications Industry Association, and Netcoalition, in support of DefendantsAppellees.Michael Barclay, Menlo Park, CA; Deborah R. Gerhardt, UNC School of Law, Chapel Hill, NC, for amicus curiae Consumer Electronics Association, in support of DefendantsAppellees.Andrew P. Bridges, Winston & Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, for amici curiae eBay Inc., Facebook, Inc., IAC/Interactivecorp., and Yahoo! Inc., in support of DefendantsAppellees.Corynne M. McSherry (Abigail Phillips, on the brief), Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA, for amici curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy & Technology, International Federation of Library Associations & Institutions, American Library Association, Association of College & Research Libraries, and Association of Research Libraries, in support of DefendantsAppellees.

David T. Goldberg (Sean H. Donahue, on the brief), Donahue & Goldberg, LLP, New York, NY, and Washington, DC, for amici curiae Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, Reporters Without Borders, and Access, in support of DefendantsAppellees.Rebecca S. Engrav, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA, for amici curiae Intellectual Property and Internet Law Professors, in support of DefendantsAppellees.Gregory P. Gulia (Vanessa C. Hew and R. Terry Parker, on the brief), Duane Morris LLP, New York, NY,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
117 cases
  • U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. UBS Real Estate Sec. Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 6, 2016
    ... ... v. SEB, S.A. , 563 U.S. 754, 769, 131 S.Ct. 2060, 179 L.Ed.2d 1167 (2011) ); see also Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. , 676 F.3d 19, 35 (2d Cir.2012) ("A person is ‘willfully blind’ ... ...
  • Jose Luis Pelaez, Inc. v. Mcgraw-Hill Global Educ. Holdings LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 2, 2019
    ... ... as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’ " Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. , 676 F.3d 19, 30 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) ) ... ...
  • Nuance Commc'ns, Inc. v. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 21, 2021
    ... ... (alteration in original) (quoting Scher L. Firm , 948 N.Y.S.2d at 338 ) (citing Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. , 676 F.3d 19, 35 (2d Cir. 2012) ). 22 The doctrine in New York is ... ...
  • Fischer v. Stephen T. Forrest, Jr., Sandra F. Forrest, Shane R. Gebauer, & Brushy Mountain Bee Farm, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 14, 2017
    ... ... Organization Copyright Treaty, and to update domestic copyright law for the digital age." Viacom Int'l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. , 676 F.3d 19, 26 (2d Cir. 2012) (citations omitted). The DMCA ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
21 firm's commentaries
  • Advanced Copyright Issues On The Internet - UPDATED September 2020
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • September 10, 2020
    ...to the service found legal in the Aereo case.518 The 513 Id. at *21-27. 514 Id. at *27. 515 Id. at *28 (citing Viacom Int’l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19, 39 (2d Cir. 2012)). 516 Aereo, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150555 at *28-29. 517 Bill Rochelle, “Broadcasters Get Permanent Injunction A......
  • An Update On The Legal Implications Of User-Generated Content: Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, And Instagram
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • November 12, 2014
    ...objective standard should be used. H.R. Rep. No. 105-551, pt. 2, at 53; see also S. Rep. No. 105-190, at 44. 33 676 F.3d 19, 31-32 (2d Cir. 2012). 34 Id. 35 UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLC, 718 F.3d 1006, 1023 (9th Cir. 2013). 36 H.R. Rep. 105-551, pt.1. 37 Marobie-FL, ......
  • Intellectual Property Newsletter - March 2013
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • April 5, 2013
    ...should not be relied upon as legal advice. For additional information, visit www.kslaw.com. 9 Circuit last year in Viacom Int’l v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012). The decision addressed two of the three statutory prerequisites to the safe harbor. To paraphrase, the safe harbor pr......
  • Business Litigation Report - November 2016
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • November 30, 2016
    ...that would make a specific act of infringement “obvious” to a reasonable person. Id. at 520, (quoting Viacom Int’l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19, 30 (2d Cir. 2012)). In determining whether Vimeo had “red flag” knowledge, the district court ruled that because 18 of the videos at issue ......
  • Get Started for Free
34 books & journal articles
  • Convergence and Conflation in Online Copyright
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 105-3, March 2020
    • March 1, 2020
    ...105-190, at 41 (1998); see also Columbia Pictures Indus., Inc. v. Fung, 710 F.3d 1020, 1041 (9th Cir. 2013); Viacom Int’l, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19, 39 (2d Cir. 2012); In re Charter Commc’ns, Inc., 393 F.3d 771, 775 (8th Cir. 2005). 1042 IOWA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 105:1027 to gain the ......
  • Twitters Beware: The Display and Performance Rights.
    • United States
    • Yale Journal of Law & Technology Vol. 21 No. 1, January 2019
    • January 1, 2019
    ...or account holders' to notify of the removal of the particular link."). (242) Id. at 211 n.277. (243) Viacom Intern., Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19, 34-35 (2d Cir. 2012). (244) See, e.g., Blevins, supra note 11, at 1840 (noting the willful blindness standard "requires factual informati......
  • Tidying up the Internet: Takedown of Unauthorized Content under Copyright, Trademark, and Defamation Law
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 41-2, March 2013
    • March 1, 2013
    ...Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt., Inc., 443 F.2d 1159, 1162 (2d Cir. 1971). 24 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(1)(A). 25 Grokster , 545 U.S. at 930. 26 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012). 27 Id. at 38. 28 Id . at 37 (“Happily, the future of digital copyright law does not turn on the confused legislative history ......
  • Tidying up the Internet: Takedown of Unauthorized Content under Copyright, Trademark, and Defamation Law
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 41-3, June 2013
    • June 1, 2013
    ...Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt., Inc., 443 F.2d 1159, 1162 (2d Cir. 1971). 24 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(1)(A). 25 Grokster , 545 U.S. at 930. 26 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012). 27 Id. at 38. 28 Id . at 37 (“Happily, the future of digital copyright law does not turn on the confused legislative history ......
  • Get Started for Free