Vialva v. 40 W. 25th St. Assocs., L.P.
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Writing for the Court | MARK C. DILLON |
| Citation | Vialva v. 40 W. 25th St. Assocs., L.P., 96 A.D.3d 735, 945 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4332 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012) |
| Decision Date | 06 June 2012 |
| Parties | Kevin R. VIALVA, et al., appellants, v. 40 WEST 25TH STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., et al., respondents, et al., defendant (and a third-party action). |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Brian J. Shoot and Stephen C. Glasser of counsel; Gabriel Arce–Yee on the brief), for appellants.
Debra J. Millman, New York, N.Y. (Steven P. Germansky of counsel), for respondents.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, L. PRISCILLA HALL, and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated January 14, 2011, which granted the motion of the defendants 40 West 25th Street Associates, L.P., GVA Williams Real Estate, Inc., and Williams Real Estate Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered June 16, 2011, which, upon the order dated January 14, 2011, is in favor of the defendants 40 West 25th Street Associates, L.P., GVA Williams Real Estate, Inc., and Williams Real Estate Co., Inc., and against them, dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants.
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants 40 West 25th Street Associates, L.P., GVA Williams Real Estate, Inc., and Williams Real Estate Co., Inc.
The appeal from the intermediate order dated January 14, 2011, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action ( see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647). The issues raised on the appeal from the order dated January 14, 2011, are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment ( seeCPLR 5501[a][1] ).
The injured plaintiff, Kevin R. Vialva, was employed by the third-party defendant A.B. Import–Export Company, Inc., which operated a store in premises leased from the property owner, the defendant 40 West 25th Street Associates, L.P. (hereinafter the owner). On February 18, 2007, the injured plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when the street vault elevator on which he was riding suddenly dropped from the street level to the basement of the premises. The injured plaintiff, and his wife, suing derivatively, commenced this action to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries. The owner and its managing agents, the defendants GVA Williams Real Estate, Inc., and Williams Real Estate Co., Inc. (hereinafter collectively the respondents), moved for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them. The Supreme Court granted the motion. The plaintiffs appeal, and we affirm.
“ ‘An out-of-possession landlord's duty to repair a dangerous condition on leased premises is imposed by statute or regulation, by contract, or by a course of conduct’ ” ( Goggins v. Nidoj Realty Corp., 93 A.D.3d 757, 758, 940 N.Y.S.2d 674, quoting Mercer v. Hellas Glass Works Corp., 87 A.D.3d 987, 988, 930 N.Y.S.2d 18;see Rivera v. Nelson Realty, LLC, 7 N.Y.3d 530, 534, 825 N.Y.S.2d 422, 858 N.E.2d 1127;Chapman v. MCS Realty, LLC, 92 A.D.3d 913, 913, 938 N.Y.S.2d 900;Alnashmi v. Certified...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Muckadackal v. CLK-HP 275 Broadhollow LLC
... ... the plaintiff (see Pulka v Edelman, 40 N.Y.2d 781, ... 390 N.Y.S.2d 393 [1976]; Engelhatt v ... Vialva v 40 W. 25th St. Assocs., L.P., 96 A.D.3d ... 735, ... ...
-
Muckadackal v. CLK-HP 275 Broadhollow LLC
... ... the plaintiff (see Pulka v Edelman, 40 N.Y.2d 781, ... 390 N.Y.S.2d 393 [1976]; Engelhatt v ... Vialva v 40 W. 25th St. Assocs., L.P., 96 A.D.3d ... 735, ... ...
-
Lugo v. Austin–Forest Assocs.
...relied before the Supreme Court ( see Madry v. Heritage Holding Corp., 96 A.D.3d at 1023, 947 N.Y.S.2d 588;Vialva v. 40 W. 25th St. Assocs., L.P., 96 A.D.3d 735, 945 N.Y.S.2d 723;Goggins v. Nidoj Realty Corp., 93 A.D.3d at 758, 940 N.Y.S.2d 674;Mercer v. Hellas Glass Works Corp., 87 A.D.3d ......
-
Notskas v. Longwood Assocs., LLC
...at 866–867, 952 N.Y.S.2d 603; Madry v. Heritage Holding Corp., 96 A.D.3d 1022, 1023, 947 N.Y.S.2d 588; Vialva v. 40 W. 25th St. Assoc., L.P., 96 A.D.3d 735, 736, 945 N.Y.S.2d 723). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, “the failure to submit an affidavit by a person with knowledge of the ......