Victor Herbert v. Shanley Company No 427 John Church Company v. Hilliard Hotel Company No 433
| Decision Date | 22 January 1917 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 427 and 433,s. 427 and 433 |
| Parties | VICTOR HERBERT, Harry B. Smith, et al., Petitioners, v. SHANLEY COMPANY. NO 427. JOHN CHURCH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. HILLIARD HOTEL COMPANY and Henri de Martini. NO 433 |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Nathan Burkan and William J. Hughes for petitioner in no. 427.
Messrs. Levi Cooke, Abraham S. Gilbert, and Francis Gilbert for respondent in No. 427.
Messrs. Louis J. Vorhaus, Moses H. Grossman, and William Grossman for petitioner in No. 433.
[Argument of Counsel from page 592 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Charles J. Campbell, Frank A. K. Boland, and Levi Cooke for respondents in No. 433.
These two cases present the same question: whether the performance of a copyrighted musical composition in a restaurant or hotel without charge for admission to hear it infringes the exclusive right of the owner of the copyright to perform the work publicly for profit. Act of March 4, 1909, chap. 320, § 1(e), 35 Stat. at L. 1075, Comp. Stat. 1913, § 9517. The last-numbered case was decided before the other and may be stated first. The plaintiff owns the copyright of a lyric comedy in which is a march called 'From Maine to Oregon.' It took out a separate copyright for the march and published it separately. The defendant hotel company caused this march to be performed in the dining room of the Vanderbilt Hotel for the entertainment of guests during meal times, in the way now common, by an orchestra employed and paid by the company. It was held by the circuit court of appeals, reversing the decision of the district court, that this was not a performance for profit within the meaning of the act. 136 C. C. A. 639, 221 Fed. 229.
The other case is similar so far as the present discussion is concerned. The plaintiffs were the composers and owners of a comic opera entitled 'Sweethearts,' containing a song of the same title as a leading feature in the performance. There is a copyright for the opera and also one for the song, which is published and sold separately. This the Shanley Company caused to be sung by professional singers, upon a stage in its restaurant on Broadway, accompanied by an orchestra. The district court, after holding that by the separate publication the plaintiffs' rights were limited to those conferred by the separate copyright,—a matter that it will not be necessary to discuss,—followed the decision in 136 C. C. A. 639, 221 Fed. 229, as to public performance for profit. 222 Fed. 344. The decree was affirmed by the circuit court of appeals. 143...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Polygram Intern. Pub., Inc. v. Nevada/TIG, Inc., Civ. A. No. 92-10785-REK.
...Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 429, 104 S.Ct. 774, 782, 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (1984); Herbert v. Shanley Co., 242 U.S. 591, 37 S.Ct. 232, 61 L.Ed. 511 (1917). "It is said that reward to the author or artist serves to induce release to the public of the products of his cr......
-
Arnstein v. Porter
...Cf. King Features Syndicate v. Fleischer, 2 Cir., 299 F. 533, 536; Falk v. Donaldson, C.C.N.Y., 57 F. 32, 37; Herbert v. Shanley, 242 U.S. 591, 594-595, 37 S.Ct. 232, 61 L.Ed. 511; Gross v. Van Dyk Gravure Co., 2 Cir., 230 F. 412, 413; Pellegrini v. Allegrini, D.C., 2 F.2d 611; Mathews Conv......
-
Unemployment Compensation Commission of Wyoming v. Mathews
... ... Insurance Company (Colo.) 88 P.2d 560; In re ... Mid-American ... owner is engaged with one John Wallace, who is a silent ... partner and general ... membership, that where a hotel through a booking agency ... contracted for the ... expected to make, a profit. Herbert v. Shanley Co., ... 242 U.S. 591, 61 L.Ed. 511, ... ...
-
Remick Music Corp. v. Interstate Hotel Co. of Nebraska
...formal intent by the proprietor to infringe, nor his knowledge of the program actually rendered, is required. Herbert v. Shanley Co., 242 U.S. 591, 37 S.Ct. 232, 61 L.Ed. 511; Buck v. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co., 283 U.S. 191, 51 S.Ct. 410, 75 L.Ed. 971, 76 A.L.R. 1266; Harms v. Cohen, D.C.Pa......
-
Barak Y. Orbach, Indirect Free Riding on the Wheels of Commerce: Dual-use Technologies and Copyright Liability
...44 See, e.g., Dreamland Ball Room, Inc. v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1929). 45 See, e.g., Herbert v. Shanley Co., 242 U.S. 591 (1916); KECA Music, Inc. v. Dingus McGee's Co., 432 F. Supp. 72 (W.D. Mo. 1977). 46 See, e.g., Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Veltin, 47 F. Supp.......
-
Copyright "band-aids" and the Future of Reform
...at 40. 26. 1 Howard B. Abrams, The Law of Copyright §§ 5.5, 5.16 (2010). 27. Stadler, supra note 21, at 705. 28. Herbert v. Shanley Co., 242 U.S. 591, 594 (1917). 29. Id. 30. Litman, supra note 20, at 47. 31. Standard Music Roll Co. v. F.A. Mills, Inc., 241 F. 360, 363 (3d Cir. 1917). Appar......
-
The denial of a general performance right in sound recordings: a policy that facilitates our democratic civil society?
...and "a cable television system is performing when it retransmits the broadcast to its subscribers...."); Herbert v. Shanley Co., 242 U.S. 591, 595 (1917) (Holmes, J.) (holding that performance in a restaurant or hotel infringes the copyright owner's public performance (6.) See 17 U.S.C. § 1......