Village Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 70072
| Decision Date | 29 October 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 70072,70072 |
| Citation | Village Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W.2d 720 (Mo. App. 1996) |
| Parties | VILLAGE LUTHERAN CHURCH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF LADUE, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Moser and Marsalek, P.C., F. Douglas O'Leary, St. Louis, for Defendants-Appellant.
Rosenblum, Goldenhersh, Silverstein & Zafft, P.C., Shulamith Simon, St. Louis, for Plaintiff-Respondent.
City of Ladue appeals from a judgment of the circuit court which reversed the Ladue City Council's denial of Village Lutheran Church's application for special use permit.We affirm the judgment of the circuit court with modification.
Village Lutheran Church("the Church") has been located on 4.2 acres of land in the City of Ladue("the City") since 1949.The present church structure was built in 1968 and an attached education building was constructed in 1973.Because of the growth in the number of young church members that occurred in the past twenty years and the growing interest in youth activities, the Church desires to construct an addition to the existing structure.
The Church's property is zoned as part of a "B" zoning district under the Ladue Zoning Code.Under § VII paragraph D of the Ladue Zoning Code, any alteration or extension of a church requires a special use permit.Although the Church never applied for a special use permit when it constructed the original church facility or first educational addition, the Church filed its application for special use permit with the City to expand its church facilities on March 25, 1993.
The Church proposed an addition of a multi-purpose building to be attached to the existing church structure.This multi-purpose building would include a junior high size basketball court and classrooms.Additionally, the Church proposed two adult Bible classrooms, one of which "fills in" a gap in the existing church structure and one that is to be added on to the back of the existing church structure.The Church's goal in building the proposed additions is to accommodate the growth in the Sunday school, pre-school summer Bible program, and various youth group activities.Additionally, the Church desires to maintain a unified structure so that church members would not have to exit the existing church structure and reenter a new structure.
Architectural and engineering firms were retained to develop and draft appropriate plans.As designed, the buildings on the Church property, both existing and proposed, would occupy 12% of the Church's property.The parking areas, existing and proposed, would cover 28% of the property and the sidewalks would cover 2% of the property.Grass and landscaping would remain on 58% of the property.
The Ladue Zoning and Planning Commission("the Commission") considered the Church's application at four meetings on June 30, 1993, September 22, 1993, November 18, 1993, and April 5, 1994.On April 13, 1994, the Commission issued a report to the Ladue City Council finding the Church's proposed additions satisfied the criteria listed in § VII paragraph C of the Ladue Zoning Ordinance for granting a special use permit.Specifically, the Commission found the Church's proposed addition is an appropriate use of the site and it does not appear that the project will have a material adverse affect upon the residents of the area in the vicinity of the site or the residents of the City in general.
Additionally, under the specific factors under § VII paragraph C, the Commission found there would be: (1) no significant increase in street traffic; (2) no fire hazards; (3) no undue concentration of people on the site; (4) & (5) no increase in required municipal services and expenditures; and (6) no likelihood of actual injury to the character of the district or of damage to property values in the area resulting from the proposed use.
The Commission did, however, find a zoning violation of the construction as proposed.The portion of the site plan showing a side yard of 25 feet was in violation of the Ladue Zoning Ordinance because the Church's property was in a "B" zoned residential area, and under § V paragraph B(1), the width of a required side yard must be at least fifty feet.The Commission recommended approval of the special use permit if the Church provided for a 50 foot side yard.If not provided for, the Commission's recommendation was for denial of the Church's application.
Since the Commission's report was filed, the Church modified its plan with respect to the side yard.The proposed side yard now measures 155 feet.
A Ladue City Council meeting was held on August 29, 1994 where the Council heard evidence from the Church in favor of the application and evidence from residents who lived in proximity of the Church in opposition to the application.On November 21, 1994, the Ladue City Council issued its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision which denied the Church's application for special use permit.
On December 20, 1994, the Church filed a petition for judicial review, writ of certiorari, declaratory judgment and damages.The counts requesting declaratory judgment and damages were later deferred.On February 21, 1995, the circuit court entered its amended judgment finding that "the decision of the Ladue City Council is not authorized by law in that the Ladue zoning regulations...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Babb v. Mo. Pub. Serv. Comm'n
...89.110, and so controls”); Deffenbaugh Indus., Inc. v. Potts, 802 S.W.2d 520, 524 (Mo.App. W.D.1990); Village Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W.2d 720, 722 (Mo.App. E.D.1996); Platte Woods United Methodist Church v. City of Platte Woods, 935 S.W.2d 735, 738 (Mo.App. W.D.1996); Chami......
-
Debold v. City of Ellisville
...we may not substitute our judgment for that of the council's." Presbyterian Church, 911 S.W.2d at 701; Village Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W.2d 720, 722 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996). The City is entitled to the benefit of all reasonable inferences from the evidence and "[i]f the evidenc......
-
Lenette Realty & Inv. Co. v. City of Chesterfield
...We affirm. FACTS We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the city council's decision. Village Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W.2d 720, 722 (Mo.App. E.D. 1996). Lenette owns a 0.80 acre parcel of land (Tract 1) at the Southwest corner of Clayton and Baxter Roads in the C......
-
St. John's Evan. Lut. v. City of Ellisville
...was "limited to safety regulations." Congregation Temple Israel, 320 S.W.2d 451 (Mo.1959); Vill. Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W.2d 720 (Mo.App.1996) [hereinafter Village Lutheran I], holding further clarified by Vill. Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 997 S.W.2d 506, 508-09 (Mo.A......
-
Establishing a buffer zone: the proper balance between the First Amendment religion clauses in the context of neutral zoning regulations.
...power a municipality may have over churches is purely for safety regulation.'" (quoting Vill. Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W. 2d 720, 722 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997))); First Covenant Church v. City of Seattle, 840 P.2d 174, 185 (Wash. 1992) ("We hold that the City's interest in preserva......
-
Section 6.13 Conditional Uses
...RSMo 2016, does not give municipalities zoning power over churches. In so holding, the court in Village Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W.2d 720 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996), relied on the earlier Supreme Court opinion in Congregation Temple Israel v. City of Creve Coeur, 320 S.W.2d 451 (Mo......
-
Section 45 Religious Entities
...houses of worship. Congregation Temple Israel v. City of Creve Coeur, 320 S.W.2d 451 (Mo. 1959); Vill. Lutheran Church v. City of Ladue, 935 S.W.2d 720 (Mo. App. E.D. 1996) (city could not require special use permit for expansion of church facilities). But see Vill. Lutheran Church v. City ......