Village of Des Plaines v. Poyer
Decision Date | 19 January 1888 |
Citation | 14 N.E. 677,123 Ill. 348 |
Parties | VILLAGE OF DES PLAINES v. POYER. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from appellate court, First district.
Benjamin Poyer was the owner of a tract of land located within the corporate limits of the village of Des Plaines, about half a mile from the inhabited part of the village, and separated from it by the Des Plaines river. This land Poyer rented, and used for picnic purposes. On May 10, 1883, the village trustees passed an ordinance declaring picnics and open-air dances within the limits of the village a nuisance, and also making it a nuisance for any person to rent, use, or allow to be used any ground within the limits of the village for such purposes. In July, 1884, the village commenced a suit against Poyer, before a justice of the peace in Des Plaines, for a violation of this ordinance, committed on July 31, 1883. Poyer was fined $100 and costs by the justice, and took an appeal to the criminal court of Cook county. Upon a trial in the criminal court, before a jury, he was again found guilty, and the jury assessed the fine at $50. Upon this verdict the court entered judgment, and Poyer appealed to the appellate court, where the judgment of the criminal court was reversed, and the cause remanded. Upon a new trial in the criminal court, the defendant was found not guilty. Upon the appeal of the village to the appellate court, that tribunal affirmed its former decision and that of the criminal court at the second trial. From this judgment the village of Des Plaines now appeals.Stiles & Lewis
and C. S. Cutting, for appellant.
John Gibbons, for appellee.
The only question involved in the present case is the validity of the following ordinance:
The village is incorporated under the general law in relation to the incorporation of villages, and is, by that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Tobacco Company and American Car Company v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company
...v. Joliet, 79 Ill. 25; Bank v. Sarlls, 28 N.E. 434; Tiedeman's Lim. of Police Power, sec. 122; Wood on Nuisances, secs. 742, 744; Village v. Poyer, 14 N.E. 677; Denver Mullen, 3 P. 393; Everett v. Council Bluffs, 46 Iowa 66; State v. Mayor, 29 N.J.L. 170; Beach's Public Corporations, secs. ......
-
Young v. Bryco Arms
...to use the streets and public ways without fear, apprehension and injury." In support, plaintiffs rely upon Village of Des Plaines v. Poyer, 123 Ill. 348, 14 N.E. 677 (1888), for the origin of this right. In Poyer, the Illinois Supreme Court was called upon to decide the validity of a villa......
-
Young v. Bryco Arms
...to themselves and to their families." As authority for the existence of such a right, plaintiffs rely on Village of Des Plaines v. Poyer, 123 Ill. 348, 351, 14 N.E. 677 (1888), in which this court stated, in dicta, that "the right of the people to be free from disturbance and reasonable app......
-
Bielecki v. City of Port Arthur
...is not a nuisance, but can acquire that character from the locality in which it is operated. Thus, in Village of Des Plaines v. Poyer, 123 Ill. 348, 14 N. E. 677, 5 Am. St. Rep. 524, it was said that a public dance was not necessarily a nuisance. In Thoenebe v. Mosby, 257 Pa. 1, 101 A. 98, ......