Village of Oquawka v. Graves
Decision Date | 07 October 1897 |
Docket Number | 336. |
Citation | 82 F. 568 |
Parties | VILLAGE OF OQUAWKA v. GRAVES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
I. M Kirkpatrick and Raus Cooper, for plaintiff in error.
O. J Bailey and James W. Sedwick, for defendant in error.
Before WOODS, JENKINS, and SHOWALTER, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff in error seeks the reversal of a judgment rendered against it and in favor of defendant in error on April 23, 1896, for $25,534.55, the aggregate of principal and interest thereon from July 1, 1891, of certain bonds made by the city of Oquawka. The declaration filed October 6, 1893, contained one special count on all the bonds and the common counts; but with the declaration was a notice in the words following:
'Notice The defendant is hereby notified that the sole causes of the action herein sued on, and of which evidence will be offered, are the twenty-three bonds mentioned in the special count, and that they are fac similes of each other except the amounts and bond numbers, the amounts and bond numbers being as in said special count specified.'
There was also filed with the declaration a copy of one of the bonds in words following: 'No. 1.
'United States of America.
'State of Illinois.
'City of Oquawka.
'Twenty-Year Six per Cent. Bond.
'Issued under an act of the general assembly of the state of Illinois, entitled 'An act relative to county and city debts, and to provide for payment thereof by taxation in such counties and cities,' approved February 13, 1865.
'The city of Oquawka, in the state of Illinois, twenty years after date, will pay the bearer hereof one thousand dollars ($1,000) and six per cent. per annum thereon, payable annually on the first day of July in each year at the agency of the treasurer of the state of Illinois, in the city of New York, on presentation and surrender of the annexed coupons as they severally become due.
'In pursuance of said act, the mayor of said city of Oquawka has hereto set his hand, and caused the seal of said city to be hereto affixed, and this bond to be countersigned by the clerk of said city of Oquawka, Illinois, this first day of July, A.D. 1871.
On written stipulation, the cause was heard without a jury, and a finding was made in words following:
On February 13, 1865, there was enacted by the Illinois legislature an act entitled 'An act relative to county and city debts, and to provide for the payment thereof by taxation in such counties and cities. ' The first section was as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of forrest City v. Bank of Forrest City
...2. Nor has the city power to issue negotiable paper. 2 Dillon, Mun. Corp. (5 ed.), §§ 870, 878; 144 U.S. 173; 56 F. 197; 71 Ark. 4, 8, 9; 82 F. 568; 83 Id. 669; Id. 137; 59 Id. 221, 227; 73 Id. 395-9; 112 Mich. 102; 70 N.W. 412; 49 La.Ann. 1758; 22 So. 1012. Such power must be specially con......
-
San Antonio Union Junior College Dist. v. Daniel, A-1424.
...fall in favor of the proposed saving of principal and interest, the Legislature, not relator, must say so. As said in Village of Oquawka v. Graves, 7 Cir., 82 F. 568, 573, wherein the town sought to save some 50 per cent. of its original bonded indebtedness by issuing refunding bonds, "If t......
-
Village of Oquawka v. Portsmouth Sav Bank
... ... Kirkpatrick and E. G. Alexander, for plaintiff in error ... A. W ... Martin, for defendant in error ... Before ... WOODS, JENKINS, and SHOWALTER, Circuit Judges ... PER ... On the ... authority of the decision in Village of Oquawka v ... Graves, 82 F. 568, the judgment in this case is ... reversed, and the cause remanded, with the direction that ... judgment be entered for the plaintiff in ... ...