Village Voice, Inc v. Rinaldi
Decision Date | 06 October 1975 |
Docket Number | No. 75-224,75-224 |
Citation | 96 S.Ct. 153,46 L.Ed.2d 112,423 U.S. 883 |
Parties | The VILLAGE VOICE, INC., et al. v. Dominic S. RINALDI |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied for want of a final judgment.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the view, stated in his previous opinions1 and those of Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments. He is also of the view, stated in his opinion in Mills v. Alabama, 384 U.S. 214, 221-222, 86 S.Ct. 1434, 16 L.Ed.2d 484 (1966),3 that the judgment below is final because further proceedings are precluded in the state court and the present posture of that judgment upon remand will deter others from exercising their constitutional right to discuss public affairs. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS would therefore grant certiorari and summarily reverse.
1Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 355-360, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974); Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 401-402, 87 S.Ct. 534, 17 L.Ed.2d 456 (1967); Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 88-91, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597 (1966).
To continue reading
Request your trial- Weatherford v. State
- U.S. v. Sherlock
- Minor v. Black, 74--2242
-
Rinaldi v. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
...action was subsequently settled before trial. (See Rinaldi v. Village Voice, 47 A.D.2d 180, 365 N.Y.S.2d 570 cert. den., 423 U.S. 883, 96 S.Ct. 153, 46 L.Ed.2d 112.) The complaint was predicated on the assertion that, after publication of the original articles, the Voice received informatio......