Villanova v. American Federation of Musicians, Local 16

Citation123 N.J.Super. 57,301 A.2d 467
PartiesGeorge VILLANOVA and Lucy Villanova, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS, LOCAL 16 et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Decision Date09 March 1973
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division

Frank A. Paglianite, West Caldwell, for plaintiffs-appellants (Dante P. Mongiardo, West Paterson, on the brief).

Richard B. Livingston, East Orange, for defendant-respondent Essex County Park Comm. (Braff, Litvak, Ertag, Wortmann & Harris, East Orange, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FRITZ and LYNCH.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FRITZ, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Essex County Park Commission. A prior proceeding not here concerned resulted in a dismissal in favor of defendant City of Newark. Defendant American Federation of Musicians is the employer against whom a workmen's compensation claim has been filed.

The facts are simple and, for the purposes of the motion, undisputed. George Villanova is a musician and as such was employed to participate in the giving of a concert on the premises of the Essex County Park Commission. No admittance fee was charged for the concert. Plaintiff claims he fell over 'boulders and debris' as he was approaching the bandstand, that the presence of this impediment was the result of negligence on the part of the Essex County Park Commission, and that as a consequence he sustained injuries.

Defendant moved for judgment on the ground that it was immunized from liability by the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:42A--1 et seq. The trial judge agreed and dismissed the action. We are of the opinion that the determination was incorrect.

The matter is one of first impression in New Jersey. The issue can be simply posited in terms of whether it was the intent of the Legislature in enacting the statute in question to include a band concert within the acivities protected thereby.

The predecessor statute, repealed by the present enactment, simply immunized landowners of agricultural lands or woodlands from responsibility for accidental personal injury suffered in the course of hunting or fishing. L.1962, c. 107. Senate Bill No. 325, introduced on January 22, 1968, sought to expand the immunity provided by relieving owners, lessees or occupants of premises from a duty to keep the premises safe in connection with hunting, fishing, trapping, hiking, horseback riding or training of dogs. A substitute bill was offered shortly thereafter and enacted in the form in which the statute now appears. L.1968, c. 73. Defendant urges that the expansion of Senate Bill No. 325 to include 'additional...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Resnick v. East Brunswick Tp. Bd. of Ed.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • July 11, 1978
    ...specific words." 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction § 47.17 at 103 (Sands ed. 1973); see also Villanova v. American Federation of Musicians, 123 N.J.Super. 57, 59, 301 A.2d 467 (App.Div.), certif. den., 63 N.J. 504, 308 A.2d 669 (1973). This sensible doctrine of Ejusdem generis, which is......
  • Old Town Development Co. v. Langford
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Indiana
    • June 17, 1976
    ...... firmly entrenched in both English and American common law protecting the lessor from liability ... 16 .         Such being the state of ......
  • Sallee v. Stewart
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • February 15, 2013
    ...the statute's ambit recreational activities that were “forms of play, amusement, diversion or relaxation.” 123 N.J.Super. 57, 301 A.2d 467, 468 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1973); see also Drake ex rel. Drake, 649 N.E.2d at 1030 (decorating a grain elevator and participating in a haunted house per......
  • Owen of Georgia, Inc. v. Shelby County
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • June 17, 1981
    ...and general expressions" in a statute. State v. Holman, 3 McCord 306, 307 (S.C.1825). See also Villanova v. American Federation of Musicians, Local 16, 123 N.J.Super. 57, 301 A.2d 467, 468 (1973); Cheatham v. Wisconsin, 85 Wis.2d 112, 270 N.W.2d 194, 198 (1978); 2A Sutherland, Statutory Con......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT