Vine v. Com., 677 MAL 2008.
| Decision Date | 27 March 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 677 MAL 2008.,677 MAL 2008. |
| Citation | 969 A.2d 1175 |
| Parties | Teresa M. VINE, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is as follows:
Did the Commonwealth Court err in holding that Petitioner had to demonstrate either that SERS did not act in good faith or that SERS had reasonable cause to question the validity of the power of attorney and apparent authority in order for Petitioner to prevail?
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Vine v. Com., State Employees' Ret. Bd.
...from his or her putative contract obligations" based upon a finding of incapacity. Id. at 9.7 The Commonwealth Court affirmed. See Vine v. SERS, 956 A.2d 1088 (Pa.Cmwlth.2008). The court indicated that, under Pennsylvania common law, the POA and transactions undertaken pursuant to it were v......
-
Vine v. Commonwealth Of Pa.
...from his or her putative contract obligations" based upon a finding of incapacity. id. at 9.7 The Commonwealth Court affirmed. See Vine v. SERS, 956 A.2d 1088 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008). The court indicated that, under Pennsylvania common law, the POA and transactions undertaken pursuant to it were......