Vineland Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Felmey
Decision Date | 31 October 1950 |
Docket Number | No. F--1278,F--1278 |
Citation | 79 A.2d 714,12 N.J.Super. 384 |
Parties | VINELAND SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. FELMEY et al. |
Court | New Jersey Superior Court |
John O. Milstead, Vineland, for the plaintiff (Milstead & McElroy, Vineland, attorneys).
Phillip P. Wodlinger, Millville, for petitioner Millville Nat. Bank.
Alfred E. Modarelli, United States Attorney, Newark.
The present action results from an application for surplus monies arising from a sale held in a mortgage foreclosure. The particular question concerns the priority of two judgment creditors of the mortgagors.
The Vineland Savings and Loan Association held a mortgage executed by and encumbering certain real estate owned by the defendants James and Dorothy Felmey. On the 9th day of March, 1950 the said Vineland Savings and Loan Association filed a complaint seeking to foreclose said mortgage, joining the Corn Exchange National Bank and Trust Company by reason of a judgment held by it against the said mortgagors, obtained in the District Court of Cumberland County, which was docketed in the office of the Clerk of Cumberland County on the 18th day of August, 1949.
Thereafter, and during the pendency of the foreclosure proceedings, the Millville National Bank obtained a final judgment against James and Dorothy Felmey in the District Court of Cumberland County on May 1, 1950, which judgment was docketed in the Cumberland County Court on June 22, 1950 and in the New Jersey Superior Court on August 2, 1950. On June 21, 1950 said real estate here involved was sold by the Sheriff of Cumberland County in connection with said foreclosure, resulting in a surplus of $561.06. The sheriff's deed is dated July 18, 1950 and was delivered to the purchaser a day or two after its date.
Execution on the judgment of the Millville National Bank was issued and levy made by the Sheriff of Mercer County on the said surplus monies then in the hands of this court on August 10, 1950. No further proceedings in connection with this levy were thereafter taken.
The levy was made in the following language: 'levy upon the rights and credits of James Felmey & Dorothy Felmey * * * upon all the right, title and interest of said defendants in and to all moneys deposited with the Superior Court of New Jersey, representing surplus moneys paid into said Superior Court by the Sheriff of Cumberland County, arising out of the sale of real estate conducted by said Sheriff of Cumberland County, in the matter of Vineland Savings and Loan Association vs. James R. Felmey, et ux., et als., Docket No. F--1278--49.'
On September 14, 1949 the said Corn Exchange National Bank and Trust Company assigned said judgment to the United States of America, which assignment was recorded in the Clerk's Office of Cumberland County on April 17, 1950. A transcript of said judgment was docketed with the Clerk of the Superior Court of New Jersey on July 13, 1950.
Neither the said Corn Exchange National Bank and Trust Company nor the United States of America have taken any proceedings, either by way of answer in the foreclosure or by way of issuing execution upon said judgment.
The Millville National Bank takes the position that it is entitled to be first paid out of the surplus monies prior to the United States of America by virtue of the levy and execution above referred to, under R.S. 2:26--137, N.J.S.A. This statute reads as follows: 'Whereas, other judgments, and recognizances, besides those, or some of those, by virtue whereof the sale aforesaid was made, might affect the real estate so sold, if no provision be made to remedy the same, and whereas, the persons who have not taken, or will not take out executions upon their judgments, or recognizances, ought not to hinder or prevent such as do take out executions from having the proper effect and fruits thereof, therefore, in any such case, the purchaser, his heirs and assigns, shall hold the lands, tenements, hereditaments, and real estate by him or her purchased as aforesaid free and clear of all other judgments and recognizances, whatsoever, on or by virtue of which no execution has been taken out and executed on the real estate so purchased.'
The United States of America, on the other hand, in effect assumes the position (1) that the property levied on is In custodia legis and hence not subject to levy; (2) at the time of levy the interest of the judgment debtor in the realty had been extinguished and that the surplus funds were personalty; and (3) the levy was upon the 'right, title and interest' (rights and credits) of the judgment debtor in the fund and as such was subject to the lien of its judgment.
In order for the Millville National Bank to succeed upon its theory it becomes necessary to first ascertain whether a levy may be made on property In custodia legis.
In Fredd v. Darnell, 107 N.J.Eq. 249 at page 253, 152 A. 236, at page 238 (Ch. 1930), the court said:
No confusion or embarrassment would be attendant upon a levy made as here, and hence the property is not immune from but is rather subject to such a levy.
The second and third arguments of the United States of America concern themselves not only with the character of the property involved but concurrently with the manner in which a priority may be obtained by a judgment subsequent in date over a judgment prior in date of recovery.
The priority which is accorded to a junior judgment over a senior judgment where a levy is made on realty results from R.S. 2:26---137, N.J.S.A. This statute, paraphrased, makes provision that the purchaser at a judgment execution sale shall obtain title free, clear and discharged from all other judgments and recognizances. The court, by analogy, determined that the mere issuance of execution and levy on real estate by a judgment creditor resulted in a priority for such judgment creditor over all other judgment creditors, regardless of the date of docketing, and that an actual sale thereunder was not requisite for such a result.
In Clement v. Kaighn, 15 N.J.Eq. 47 at page 57 (Ch. 1862), the court said:
See also Riverside Building & Loan Ass'n v. Bishop, 98 N.J.Eq. 508, 131 A. 78 (Ch. 1925); Swift & Co. v. First National Bank of Hightstown, 114 N.J.Eq. 417, 168 A. 827 (Ch. 1933); Lippincott v. Smith, 69 N.J.Eq. 787, 64 A. 141 (E. & A. 1905).
Under a proper state of facts, therefore, a levy upon realty under a judgment may, in and of itself, succeed in establishing a priority in lien thereof.
One of the elements required to make such a priority effective under R.S. 2:26--137, 137, N.J.S.A. is that the property levied upon be realty.
The nature of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foreclosure of Deed of Trust Recorded in Book 911, at Page 512, Catawba County Registry, In re
...as realty held by the entirety. See Danes v. Smith, 30 N.J.Super. 292, 104 A.2d 455 (App.Div.1954); Vineland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Felmey, 12 N.J.Super. 384, 79 A.2d 714 (Ch.Div.1950); Morris v. Glaser, 106 N.J.Eq. 585, 151 A. 766 (Ch.1930); Servis v. Dorn, 76 N.J.Eq. 241, 76 A. 246 (Ch.1......
-
Danes v. Smith
...106 N.J.Eq. 585, 592, 151 A. 766 (Ch.1930), affirmed 110 N.J.Eq. 661, 160 A. 578 (E. & A.1932); Vineland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Felmey, 12 N.J.Super. 384, 392, 79 A.2d 714 (Ch.Div.1950). During the pendency of these proceedings and while the receiver was in charge of the premises in questi......
-
In re Bridgepoint Nurseries, Inc.
...to equity of redemption, and, meanwhile, mortgagor is treated as owner of lands for all purposes. Vineland Savings and Loan Assn. v. Felmey, 12 N.J.Super. 384, 391, 79 A.2d 714, 717 (Ch.1951); see also, Midlantic National Bank v. Sourlis, 141 B.R. 826 (D.N.J.1992); Stanton v. Metropolitan L......
-
In re Gardner, Case No. 15-15192 (MBK)
...when the personal property of the debtor is levied upon. In re Blease, 605 F.2d 97 (3d Cir. 1979) (citing Vineland Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Felmey, 12 N.J. Super. 384, 393 (Ch.Div. 1950)). Therefore, the levying creditor has a legal interest in the subject property relating back to the date of ......