Vining v. Renton

Docket Number20110233
Decision Date03 May 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Kartes v. Kartes
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 19, 2013
    ...serve the best interests of the child, the court must consider the factors set out in N.D.C.C. § 14–09–06.2(1). E.g., Vining v. Renton, 2012 ND 86, ¶ 17, 816 N.W.2d 63;Siewert v. Siewert, 2008 ND 221, ¶ 19, 758 N.W.2d 691. [¶ 35] The district court made extensive and detailed findings of fa......
  • Larson v. Larson
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • April 12, 2016
    ...transferring custody substantially outweigh the child's stability with the custodial parent.Seibold, at ¶ 11 (quoting Vining v. Renton, 2012 ND 86, ¶ 17, 816 N.W.2d 63 ).[¶ 11] Here, the district court found a material change in circumstances occurred and neither party challenges that findi......
  • Johnshoy v. Johnshoy
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • June 24, 2021
    ...the applicable N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.2(1) factors." Schroeder v. Schroeder , 2014 ND 106, ¶ 7, 846 N.W.2d 716 (quoting Vining v. Renton , 2012 ND 86, ¶ 17, 816 N.W.2d 63 ). "A prima facie case justifying a modification of primary residential responsibility and, therefore, an evidentiary heari......
  • Hageman v. Hageman
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • February 26, 2013
    ...to modify primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Vining v. Renton, 2012 ND 86, ¶ 15, 816 N.W.2d 63. A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if there is no evidence to support it, if the finding is induced by an erroneous ......
  • Get Started for Free