Vironment, Inc. v. Light, 20557
Decision Date | 14 January 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 20557,20557 |
Citation | 592 N.W.2d 600,1999 SD 43 |
Parties | VIRONMENT, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles E. LIGHT, Defendant and Appellee. . Considered on Briefs |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Dennis C. McFarland, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, for plaintiff and appellant.
Timothy L. James of James & Associates, Yankton, South Dakota, for defendant and appellee.
¶1 This is a companion case to Yankton Ethanol v. Vironment, # 20558, the cases involve identical facts and two identical issues:
1. Whether the court erred in dismissing plaintiff's complaint as barred by the period of limitation set forth in 11 USCS 546(a)(1)(A).
2. Whether the court erred in granting the amended motion to dismiss based upon SDCL 47-7-50.
As to these issues, our decision in Yankton Ethanol controls the motion to dismiss in this case. Therefore, this case is also reversed and remanded
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Hirning
...... reasonable inferences which he is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his experience. Terry, 392 U.S. at 27, 88 S.Ct. at 1883 ......