Visor v. Waters

Decision Date06 January 1936
Docket Number10
Citation182 A. 241,320 Pa. 406
PartiesVisor et al. v. Waters et al. (Gallagher, Appellant)
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued: November 26, 1935

Appeal, No. 10, May T., 1936, by defendant, William P. Gallagher, from order and decree of C.P. Dauphin Co., Commonwealth Docket, 1935, No. 62, in case of Harry Visor et al. v. Charles A. Waters, Treasurer of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Frank E. Baldwin, Auditor General, and William P. Gallagher. Judgment affirmed.

Petition for writ of alternative mandamus.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the lower court, by HARGEST, P.J., reported at 41 Dauphin County Reports 219. Decree entered directing the issuing of a mandamus. Defendant Gallagher appealed.

Error assigned, among others, was decree.

Judgment affirmed at appellant's costs.

Robert L. Myers, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, with him Charles J. Margiotti, Attorney General, for appellant.

Gilbert Nurick and Herman H. Yaffe, for appellees, were not heard.

Before FRAZER, C.J., KEPHART, SCHAFFER, MAXEY, DREW, LINN and BARNES, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the full and comprehensive opinion of the learned President Judge of the lower court, which is printed at length in 41 Dauphin County Reports 219.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State ex rel. Hammond v. Maxfield
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 24 Diciembre 1942
    ... ... note; Prince v. Skillin , 71 Me. 361, 36 Am ... Rep. 325; In re Milford Township, Supervisors' ... Removal , 291 Pa. 46, 139 A. 623; Visor v ... Waters , 320 Pa. 406, 182 A. 241; Commonwealth ex ... rel. Braughler v. Weir , 165 Pa. 284, 30 A. 835; ... People ex rel. Moloney v ... ...
  • State ex rel. Jugler v. Grover
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 29 Abril 1942
    ... ... Education of Chicago , 367 Ill. 91, 10 N.E.2d 403; ... People v. McCormick , 261 Ill. 413, 103 N.E ... 1053, Ann. Cas. 1915A, 338; Visor v ... Waters , 320 Pa. 406, 182 A. 241; State v ... Wright , 211 Ind. 41, 5 N.E.2d 504; Suermann ... v. Hadley , 327 Pa. 190, 193 A ... ...
  • Quintana v. Holland
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 23 Mayo 1958
    ...aside and nullify the positive provisions of a law. Citing. A new law can do that, but nothing less than a law can." Visor v. Waters, 1936, 320 Pa. 406, 182 A. 241, 247. "A concurrent resolution is one that is approved by both houses of Congress but is not sent to the President for signatur......
  • Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Philadelphia v. Culp
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 6 Enero 1936

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT