Vlahakis v. Parker
| Court | Appellate Court of Illinois |
| Citation | Vlahakis v. Parker, 3 Ill.App.3d 126, 278 N.E.2d 523 (Ill. App. 1971) |
| Decision Date | 14 December 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 55752.,55752. |
| Parties | PETER J. VLAHAKIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHARD G. PARKER, Defendant-Appellee. |
Peter J. Vlahakis, pro se.
Abstract of Decision.
Judgment affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Maras v. Bertholdt
...order. Prior to entry of a new order, a party must give notice that a motion will be presented to the court. (Cf. Vlahakis v. Parker (1971), 3 Ill.App.3d 126, 278 N.E.2d 523.) Absent such notice, the order is void. Because plaintiff did not receive notice of the written August 23, 1982, ord......
-
Lajato v. AT & T, Inc.
...will not impair the validity or timeliness of the motion. See In re Marriage of Collins. Defendant's reliance on Vlahakis v. Parker, 3 Ill.App.3d 126, 278 N.E.2d 523 (1971) (abstract of op.) and Ingrassia v. Ingrassia, 156 Ill.App.3d 483, 109 Ill.Dec. 68, 509 N.E.2d 729 (1987) is misplaced.......
-
Marriage of Collins, In re
...301 N.E.2d 39, 40 (award of attorney's fees entered on a motion not served on the other party held to be void); Vlahakis v. Parker (1971), 3 Ill.App.3d 126, 278 N.E.2d 523 (abstract) (motion made within 30-day period as required but not served until a few days later was not timely filed).) ......
-
Hartman v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
...633, 301 N.E.2d 39, 40 (award of attorney fees entered on a motion not served on the other party held to be void); Vlahakis v. Parker (1971), 3 Ill.App.3d 126, 278 N.E.2d 523 (abstract of opinion) (motion made within 30-day period as required but not served until a few days later was not ti......
Get Started for Free
