Vodoff v. Mehmood

Decision Date14 February 2012
Citation938 N.Y.S.2d 472,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 01244,92 A.D.3d 773
PartiesEduard VODOFF, respondent, v. Tahir MEHMOOD, et al., appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Marjorie E. Bornes, New York, N.Y., for appellants.

Dinkes & Schwitzer, New York, N.Y. (Naomi Skura of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated August 11, 2011, which denied their motion to compel the plaintiff to provide authorizations for the release of certain medical records pertaining to the plaintiff's preexisting condition of diabetes.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the defendants' motion to compel the plaintiff to provide authorizations for the release of certain medical records pertaining to the plaintiff's preexisting condition of diabetes is granted.

A party must provide duly executed and acknowledged written authorizations for the release of pertinent medical records when that party has waived the physician-patient privilege by affirmatively putting his or her physical or mental condition in issue ( see CPLR 3121[a]; Dillenbeck v. Hess, 73 N.Y.2d 278, 539 N.Y.S.2d 707, 536 N.E.2d 1126; Cynthia B. v. New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 60 N.Y.2d 452, 456–457, 470 N.Y.S.2d 122, 458 N.E.2d 363; Diamond v. Ross Orthopedic Group, P.C., 41 A.D.3d 768, 839 N.Y.S.2d 211). Further, CPLR 3101(a) requires full disclosure of all evidence material and necessary to the *473 prosecution or defense of an action, regardless of the burden of proof ( see Allen v. Crowell–Collier Publ. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 288 N.Y.S.2d 449, 235 N.E.2d 430). Here, the defendants met their initial burden of showing that the nature and severity of the plaintiff's pre-existing medical condition is material and necessary to the issue of damages, if any, recoverable for a claimed loss of enjoyment of life due to his current injuries ( see Abdalla v. Mazl Taxi, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 803, 804, 887 N.Y.S.2d 250; Amoroso v. City of New York, 66 A.D.3d 618, 887 N.Y.S.2d 163; Orlando v. Richmond Precast, Inc., 53 A.D.3d 534, 861 N.Y.S.2d 765; Weber v. Ryder TRS, Inc., 49 A.D.3d 865, 854 N.Y.S.2d 480; Diamond v. Ross Orthopedic Group, P.C., 41 A.D.3d at 769, 839 N.Y.S.2d 211). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to establish that he did not suffer from a preexisting medical condition of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • O'Brien v. Vill. of Babylon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 d3 Agosto d3 2017
    ...of enjoyment of life" ( Montalto v. Heckler, 113 A.D.3d 741, 978 N.Y.S.2d 891 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Vodoff v. Mehmood, 92 A.D.3d 773, 938 N.Y.S.2d 472 ; Amoroso v. City of New York, 66 A.D.3d 618, 887 N.Y.S.2d 163 ; Orlando v. Richmond Precast, Inc., 53 A.D.3d 534, 535, 86......
  • Dilorenzo v. Toledano
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 11 d1 Março d1 2019
    ...life (emphasis added). See id. See also Montalto v. Heckler, 113 A.D.3d 741, 978 N.Y.S.2d 891 (2d Dept. 2014); Vodoff v. Mehmood, 92 A.D.3d 773, 938 N.Y.S.2d 472 (2d Dept. 2012); Amoroso v. City of New York, 66 A.D.3d 618, 887 N.Y.S.2d 163 (2d Dept. 2009). The Court notes that, in the insta......
  • ACG Credit Co. II v. Hearst
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 d3 Janeiro d3 2013
    ...the prosecution or defense of an action ( see Del Vecchio v. Danielle Assoc., LLC, 94 A.D.3d 941, 942, 942 N.Y.S.2d 217;Vodoff v. Mehmood, 92 A.D.3d 773, 938 N.Y.S.2d 472). The statute should be construed liberally to permit the discovery of material that will sharpen the issues for trial a......
  • Cristiano v. York Hunter Servs., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 d3 Outubro d3 2012
    ...discovery of the records from Pine Street Family Care Center pertaining to the plaintiff's fractured rib injury ( see Vodoff v. Mehmood, 92 A.D.3d 773, 938 N.Y.S.2d 472;Azznara v. Strauss, 81 A.D.3d 578, 915 N.Y.S.2d 868;Abdalla v. Mazl Taxi, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 803, 804, 887 N.Y.S.2d 250;Amoro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT