Vogt v. Corbett

Decision Date26 September 1990
Docket NumberNo. 69252,69252
Citation563 N.E.2d 447,138 Ill.2d 482,150 Ill.Dec. 560
Parties, 150 Ill.Dec. 560 Gregory VOGT, Indiv. and as Agent of James Vogt, et al., Appellants, v. Dr. Maxwell CORBETT et al., Appellees.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

William E. Phillips, Lowell D. Snorf III, Michael F. Healy and Andrew P. Allen, of Phillips, Healy & Allen, Chicago, for appellants.

Cassiday, Schade & Gloor (Timothy J. Ashe, Lisa A. Masucci and Lynn D. Dowd, of counsel), and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon (Ruth E. VanDemark and Gregory S. Norrod, of counsel), Chicago, for appellees.

Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the court:

In Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical Center (1990), 136 Ill.2d 450, 460, 145 Ill.Dec. 894, 557 N.E.2d 873, this court held that third-party actions for contribution against doctors are subject to the medical malpractice statute of repose (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. 110, par. 13-212(a)). The instant case raises the issue of whether the decision in Hayes is consistent with this court's earlier decision in Stephens v. McBride (1983), 97 Ill.2d 515, 74 Ill.Dec. 24, 455 N.E.2d 54, which held that the notice requirements of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. 85, pars. 8-101 through 8-103) are not applicable to actions for contribution against governmental entities.

On May 6, 1978, Gia and Michael Stefani were involved in a car accident. The Stefanis were passengers in a car that was owned and operated by Brian and Linda Scialabba, which was struck by a car owned and operated by appellants Gregory Vogt and James Vogt. Michael Stefani received treatment for injuries he sustained during the collision at a hospital owned by defendant Gottlieb Memorial Hospital. During treatment, Elizabeth Paulsen, a nurse and employee of Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, was pushing Michael Stefani in his wheelchair when he fell and refractured his left leg.

The Stefanis, through their mother and next friend, Jeanette Stefani, filed a negligence action on November 12, 1981, against the Scialabbas, the Vogts, Elizabeth Paulsen, and Gottlieb Memorial Hospital. Soon thereafter, the Scialabbas settled with the Stefanis and were dismissed from the case.

On October 22, 1984, Michael Stefani filed a separate medical malpractice action against appellees, Dr. Henry Acuna and Dr. Maxwell Corbett, alleging that appellees negligently manipulated Michael Stefani's leg during his hospitalization at Gottlieb Memorial Hospital in 1978, causing the leg to fracture. That action was dismissed on the grounds that the action was barred by the medical malpractice statute of repose (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. 110, par. 13-212).

Subsequent to the dismissal of the medical malpractice action, on September 10, 1986, the Vogts filed a third-party complaint in the original negligence action for contribution against appellees, Dr. Acuna and Dr. Corbett. The trial court granted appellees' motion to dismiss the third-party complaint on the basis that it was barred by the medical malpractice statute of repose (Ill.Rev.Stat.1983, ch. 110, par. 13-212). The appellate court, relying upon its earlier decision in Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical Center (1989), 180 Ill.App.3d 441, 129 Ill.Dec. 372, 535 N.E.2d 1137, aff'd (1990), 136 Ill.2d 450, 145 Ill.Dec. 894, 557 N.E.2d 873, affirmed the dismissal of the complaint. (187 Ill.App.3d 1124 (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23 (107 Ill.2d R. 23)).) We granted appellants' petition for leave to appeal (107 Ill.2d R. 315(a)).

The medical malpractice statute of repose provides in relevant part:

"Except as provided in Section 13-215 of this Act, no action for damages for injury or death against any physician, dentist, registered nurse or hospital duly licensed under the laws of this State, whether based upon tort, or breach of contract, or otherwise, arising out of patient care shall be brought * * * more than 4 years after the date on which occurred the act or omission or occurrence alleged in such action to have been the cause of such injury or death." Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. 110, par. 13-212(a).

Appellants in this case claim that the four-year period of repose contained in the medical malpractice statute of repose does not apply to contribution actions. During the pendency of this appeal, this court handed down its decision in Hayes, holding that the medical malpractice statute of repose does indeed apply to contribution actions. (Hayes, 136 Ill.2d at 460, 145 Ill.Dec. 894, 557 N.E.2d 873.) In so doing, this court affirmed the appellate court decision (Hayes, 180 Ill.App.3d 441, 129 Ill.Dec. 372, 535 N.E.2d 1137) which provided the basis for the appellate court's decision in the instant case.

Appellants support their claim in this case with many of the same arguments rejected by this court in Hayes. Appellants first argue that contribution actions are not "actions for damages," but rather are equitable actions, and therefore do not come within the purview of the medical malpractice statute of repose. This court held in Hayes, however, that the phrase "action for damages" as used in the medical malpractice statute of repose "bars any action after the period of repose seeking damages against a physician or other enumerated health-care provider for injury or death arising out of patient care, whether at law or in equity." (Emphasis added.) (Hayes, 136 Ill.2d at 456, 145 Ill.Dec. 894, 557 N.E.2d 873.) This court similarly rejected appellants' second argument, that the statute of limitations governing contribution actions (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. 110, par. 13-204) should supersede the medical malpractice statute of repose. See Hayes, 136 Ill.2d at 459, 145 Ill.Dec. 894, 557 N.E.2d 873.

Appellants offer one other argument which was not addressed by this court in Hayes. According to appellants, the appellate court's decision in Hayes (and, consequently, this court's decision in Hayes ) is inconsistent with this court's decision in Stephens v. McBride (1983), 97 Ill.2d 515, 74 Ill.Dec. 24, 455 N.E.2d 54. In Stephens, 97 Ill.2d at 525, 74 Ill.Dec. 24, 455 N.E.2d 54, this court held "that the notice provisions contained in the Tort Immunity Act [Ill.Rev.Stat.1979, ch. 85, pars. 8-101 through 8-103] are inapplicable to a defendant seeking contribution from a governmental...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Rognant v. Palacios
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 31, 1991
    ...Mercy Hospital & Medical Center (1990), 136 Ill.2d 450, 145 Ill.Dec. 894, 557 N.E.2d 873 (Hayes ), and Vogt v. Corbett (1990), 138 Ill.2d 482, 150 Ill.Dec. 560, 563 N.E.2d 447 (Vogt ), which hold that the medical malpractice statute of repose (Ill.Rev.Stat.1989, ch. 110, par. 13-212) applie......
  • Ashley v. Evangelical Hospitals Corp.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 26, 1992
    ...contribution. (See also Antunes v. Sookhakitch (1992), 146 Ill.2d 477, 167 Ill.Dec. 981, 588 N.E.2d 1111; Vogt v. Corbett (1990), 138 Ill.2d 482, 150 Ill.Dec. 560, 563 N.E.2d 447.) The parties here disagree, however, as to whether the holding in Hayes extends to third-party actions for impl......
  • Chand v. Schlimme
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • September 26, 1990
  • Roberson v. Belleville Anesthesia Associates, Ltd.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 9, 1991
    ...for contribution against doctors. (Hayes, 136 Ill.2d 450, 145 Ill.Dec. 894, 557 N.E.2d 873; see also Vogt v. Corbett (1990), 138 Ill.2d 482, 486, 150 Ill.Dec. 560, 562, 563 N.E.2d 447, 449.) As the contribution claim was brought after the expiration of the four-year statute of repose, the c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT