Voight v. Voight, No. 17679.

• Court: Supreme Court of Nebraska
• Writing for the Court: HAMER
• Citation: 148 N.W. 83,96 Neb. 465
• Parties: VOIGHT v. VOIGHT.
• Decision Date: 23 June 1914
• Docket Number: No. 17679.

96 Neb. 465
148 N.W. 83

VOIGHT
v.
VOIGHT.

No. 17679.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

June 23, 1914.

Syllabus by the Court.

Defendant, who was the owner of a farm, was sued by plaintiff for labor performed thereon and for other considerations. An agreement was entered into, by the terms of which defendant agreed to turn over to plaintiff certain specified articles of personal property, rent his farm to plaintiff for a term of years at an agreed rental, and pay to plaintiff $2,000 in money when defendant sold said land, in consideration for which plaintiff was to dismiss his action against defendant. Defendant turned over to plaintiff the specified articles of personal property and put him in possession of the farm. Plaintiff dismissed his action against defendant. Soon thereafter defendant repudiated his agreement, refused to sell his farm, and evicted plaintiff therefrom, and also refused to pay the cash consideration of said agreement. Held, that such acts on the part of defendant rendered the cash consideration of the agreement at once due and payable.

The evidence examined and held to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.

The consideration for an agreement may be shown to include matters not specified therein, if not inconsistent therewith.

Appeal from District Court, Platte County; Hollenbeck, Judge.

Action by Adolph Voight against Ferdinand Voight. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

[148 N.W. 83]

Critchfield & Rose, of Fullerton, and Albert & Wagner, of Columbus, for appellant.

Reeder & Lightner and A. M. Post, all of Columbus, for appellee.

HAMER, J.

This case involves a controversy between three brothers. They were farmers and lived together. Each was beyond the age of 60 years. The defendant was the owner of a farm in Platte county. His brothers came to live with him on this farm. He was a bachelor. One of the brothers was married, Adolph. He brought his wife with him to live on the farm. The three brothers lived together on the brother's farm until shortly before the quarrel. The two brothers brought actions against the defendant. Also the wife of the plaintiff brought an action against the defendant. Adolph Voight brought this action in 1908 against Ferdinand Voight in the district court of Platte county, alleging that he had entered into a contract with the defendant by which he (the said Adolph Voight) and his daughter Lena Voight, and his other daughter Annie Voight, and his son Christian Voight, and his other son Henry Voight, should work for the defendant on the farm

[148 N.W. 84]

then owned by the defendant, which was near Genoa, Neb.; that they were to work for defendant as long as it was mutually agreeable, and that they were to receive for their labor a fair and just compensation; that on the 26th day of October, 1908, the said defendant repudiated the said agreement and ordered the plaintiff and his children to leave the place and refused to pay any sum whatever to the said Adolph Voight and his children for the labor which they had performed; that the said Ferdinand Voight was indebted to the plaintiff because of the plaintiff's services and the services of his children in the sum of $9,530; that Fred Voight, one of the said brothers, brought an action in the district court of Platte county against the said Ferdinand Voight, alleging that he (the said Fred Voight) had worked for the defendant under an agreement that he should be paid a reasonable compensation for his services, and that said Ferdinand had failed to pay him, and that the said Ferdinand Voight was indebted to him (the said Fred Voight) for such services in the sum of $7,200; that Margaret A. Voight had brought suit against the defendant Ferdinand in the district court of Platte county in which she charged that on or about the 4th day of April, 1908, said Ferdinand Voight had made an assault upon her and had struck her a blow with his fist and had thrown her with force and violence against a table, and by reason of such assault the said plaintiff Margaret A. Voight had been seriously injured and had been compelled to submit to a surgical operation and had been confined in the hospital; and that she had suffered injuries to the extent of $5,000 for the assault. It was also charged in the said action that the said Ferdinand Voight had abused and vilified the plaintiff in said case and had called her by vulgar and abusive names; that after the bringing of the said cases the pastor of the said brothers got the parties together and compromised their differences; that, as a result of the compromise, the defendant gave the two brothers a lease of the farm, and also made a bill of sale of a considerable amount of personal property; that the two brothers and the plaintiff's wife joined in a release of all claims that they had against the defendant; and that pursuant to this settlement they entered into possession of the farm and of the personal property. The parties appear to have made a settlement by which Ferdinand Voight promised to Adoph and Fritz Voight that he would rent his farm to them for five years at a thousand dollars a year, and that they might have the farm so long as he owned it; they to settle and to withdraw their suits against him. Ferdinand was to give to the brothers all of the personal property, including horses, cattle, hogs, and machinery, and also a cornfield containing from 700 to 1,000 bushels of corn and 60 bushels of wheat, and 600 pounds of flour in the mill, and was to pay the brothers in money $2,000 each, to Adolph Voight $2,000, and to Fritz Voight $2,000. The money was to be paid when he sold his farm. He was also to pay Henry Voight, the son of Adolph Voight, $200. Ferdinand Voight reserved to...