Vollmer v. State
| Decision Date | 29 September 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 75-1244,75-1244 |
| Citation | 337 So.2d 1024 |
| Parties | Brian John VOLLMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Steven H. Denman, Asst. Public Defender, and Robert S. Laing, Legal Intern, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Appellant was charged with resisting an officer with violence contrary to Fla.Stat. § 843.01 and two counts of possessing a controlled substance in violation of Fla.Stat. § 893.13(1)(e). He pled nolo contendere, preserving his rights on appeal, and was sentenced to two years. He contends that he could not ge guilty of violating Fla.Stat. § 843.01, because the officer was acting illegally, and furthermore, that the controlled substance found on his person should have been suppressed because the search was unjustified. We agree and reverse.
The events in question occurred on March 1, 1975, at approximately 3:00 A.M. As Officer Alexander of the Lakeland Police Department was traveling south on Florida Avenue in a marked police vehicle, he observed the appellant walking north between Edgewood and Windsor Streets on Florida. There was no evidence of any criminal activity in this area of Lakeland on that morning. The officer had no reason to believe that the appellant had committed any crime. But, as the officer drove by, he noticed the appellant watching the patrol car. He then turned his car around to further observe the appellant whereupon he stopped him and asked him for his name. When the appellant replied that his name was 'Bill Hollis,' the officer inquired as to whether he had any identification. When appellant answered in the negative, the officer next asked whether appellant had a wallet. Appellant then replied 'yes,' and produced a wallet. As appellant opened the wallet the officer saw a Florida driver's license and asked to inspect it. Appellant gave it to the officer and upon inspection, the officer determined that the license bore the name 'John Brian Vollmer.' When Officer Alexander read that name aloud, appellant 'took off running' and the officer gave chase on foot. When the officer caught appellant a struggle ensued. Appellant was arrested for resisting an officer with violence. A subsequent search of his person at the police station revealed LSD and cocaine.
In this instance the initial stop by the officer was not justified. Without more, the fact that appellant was walking along a main public thoroughfare at 3:00 A.M. and turned to look at a police car is an insufficient basis to justify a stop under Terry v. Ohio, 1968, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, or Florida's Stop and Frisk Law, Fla.Stat. § 901.151. See Thomas v. State, Fla.App.4th 1974, 297 So.2d 850, in which our sister court held that stopping a car at 5:00 A.M. was unjustified when the only events arousing suspicion were that the driver started to pass a police car and then pulled back, and the passenger then turned to look at the police car.
We recognize that a brief stop of a suspicious individual, in order to determine his identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while obtaining more information, may be most reasonable in light of the facts known to the officer at the time. Adams v. Williams, 1972, 407 U.S. 143, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612. And, where the public safety is endangered, identification may properly be requested. Cf., Hardie v. State, Fla.1976, 333 So.2d 13. But here, there was no evidence of any danger to the public safety and there were no circumstances to justify the police to suspect the appellant of being involved in any...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Slydell v. State
...are relevant to a determination of reasonable suspicion. See Ward v. State, 453 So.2d 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)(citing Vollmer v. State, 337 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), petition for review dismissed, 347 So.2d 432 (Fla.1977), for the principle that nothing that transpires after the initial ......
-
Sanchez v. State
...for a stop), Clark v. State, 677 So.2d 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), Parker v. State, 363 So.2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), and Vollmer v. State, 337 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)with Lewis v. State, 625 So.2d 84 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (finding that avoiding eye contact is not suggestive of criminal con......
-
Jones v. State
...of this case, substantially aid the state's position. See Scott v. State, 549 S.W.2d 170 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Vollmer v. State, 337 So.2d 1024 (Fla.App.1976). Appellant was driving on a public road. The hour was not late; the area was not untraveled at this time of night. Compare Allen v. Sta......
-
State v. Stevens
...326 (Fla.1977); Lower v. State, 348 So.2d 410 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Stanley v. State, 327 So.2d 243 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); Vollmer v. State, 337 So.2d 1024 (Fla.2d DCA 1976). In the present case, however, there were numerous factors which, when interpreted in the light of Officer Ludwig's knowledg......