Von Ludwitz v. Ralston, 83-1383
| Decision Date | 09 September 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-1383,83-1383 |
| Citation | 716 F.2d 528 |
| Parties | William E. Hutchings VON LUDWITZ, Appellant, v. George A. RALSTON, North Central Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Robert G. Ulrich, U.S. Atty., Frederick O. Griffin, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for respondents-appellees.
William E. Hutchings Von Ludwitz, petitioner-appellant, pro se.
Before HEANEY, BRIGHT and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.
William E. Hutchings Von Ludwitz was convicted in the District Court for the District of Oregon of kidnapping and is currently serving a life sentence at the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. He filed a petition for habeas corpus in the District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri challenging his conviction on a number of grounds. The district court dismissed for failure to file a motion to set aside sentence with the sentencing court as required by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1976). We affirm.
Section 2255 provides that a petition for habeas corpus may not be filed by an inmate convicted of a federal crime unless the inmate can show that the remedies available under Sec. 2255 are unavailable or ineffective. See United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205, 223, 72 S.Ct. 263, 274, 96 L.Ed. 232 (1952); McGhee v. Hanberry, 604 F.2d 9, 10 (5th Cir.1979). The burden is on the petitioner to show that Sec. 2255 relief would be ineffective. Cagle v. Ciccone, 368 F.2d 183, 184 (8th Cir.1966).
We agree with the district court that Von Ludwitz has failed to make this showing and affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir.R. 14.
1 The Honorable Elmo B. Hunter, United States Senior District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mosley v. Hendrix
...that § 2255 relief in the sentencing court would be inadequate or ineffective. DeSimone, 805 F.2d at 323 (citing Von Ludwitz v. Ralston, 716 F.2d 528, 529 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam)). In establishing such a requirement, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has clearly......
-
Scott v. Yates
... ... DeSimone, 805 F.2d at 323 (citing Von Ludwitz v. Ralston, 716 F.2d 528, 529 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam)). In establishing such a requirement, ... ...
-
James v. Jett
... ... 1986) ( per curiam ), quoting 28 U.S.C. 2255. See also Von Ludwitz v. Ralston , 716 F.2d 528, 529 (8th Cir. 1983) ( per curiam ) (same). The "inadequate or ... ...
-
Potts v. US
... ... Von Ludwitz v. Ralston, 716 F.2d 528 (8th Cir.1983) ... Accordingly, the undersigned ... ...