Vosnos v. Wenzel
| Decision Date | 25 April 1962 |
| Docket Number | 444.,Gen. No. 48 |
| Citation | 35 Ill. App.2d 390,183 N.E.2d 193 |
| Parties | John D. Vosnos, Appellee, v. George Wenzel and Elizabeth Wenzel, Appellants. |
| Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Albert H. Werner, of Chicago (C.D. Snewind, of counsel), for appellants.
William C. Wines and Allen S. Gerrard, of Chicago, for appellee.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE McCORMICK.
Appeal dismissed.
Not to be published in full.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Sullivan v. Bach
...pleading. (Curtis v. Albion-Brown's Post 590 American Legion (1965), 65 Ill.App.2d 473, 477, 213 N.E.2d 621, citing Vosnos v. Wenzel (1962), 35 Ill.App.2d 390, 183 N.E.2d 193; see Rose v. Centralia Township High School District No. 200 (1978), 59 Ill.App.3d 606, 607, 16 Ill.Dec. 932, 375 N.......
-
Gilbert v. Braniff Intern. Corp.
...30 days to file an amended petition was not a final, appealable order. For this point, Maple Investment cited Vosnos v. Wenzel, 35 Ill.App.2d 390, 183 N.E.2d 193 (1962), which involved an Attempt to appeal during the 30-day leave I simply do not believe that the Illinois courts would regard......
-
Maple Inv. & Development Corp. v. Skore
...vacate a judgment but allowing the defendant 30 days to file an amended petition is not a final, appealable order. Vosnos v. Wenzel (1962), 35 Ill.App.2d 390, 183 N.E.2d 193. The order appealed from is not a final order. It did not terminate the litigation between the parties. Not only did ......
-
Vosnos v. Wenzel
...vacate the judgment, it was not a final order since permission was given to the defendants to amend their petition.' Vosnos v. Wenzel, 35 Ill.App.2d 390, 183 N.E.2d 193. On the day the Appellate Court mandate was filed in the Municipal Court, the defendants moved to file instanter the defen......
Request a trial to view additional results