Voss Truck Lines, Inc. v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, Case Number: 29069

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
Writing for the CourtHURST, J.
Citation102 P.2d 173,1940 OK 56,187 Okla. 289
Docket NumberCase Number: 29069
Decision Date30 January 1940
PartiesVOSS TRUCK LINES, Inc., v. CITIZENS-FARMERS NAT. BANK

1940 OK 56
102 P.2d 173
187 Okla. 289

VOSS TRUCK LINES, Inc.,
v.
CITIZENS-FARMERS NAT.
BANK

Case Number: 29069

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided: January 30, 1940


Syllabus

¶0 1. APPEAL AND ERROR--GARNISHMENT--Defects in form of process served on garnishee waived by appearance.

Where garnishment process, irregular and defective in form only, is served on garnishee, and it answers and submits itself to the jurisdiction of the court, a judgment against such garnishee will not be reversed upon the application of defendant because of such defective process.

2. GARNISHMENT-- Garnishment in aid of execution returned unsatisfted--Statutory procedure for reaching property or debts in another county.

Sections 500, 501, and 502, O. S. 1931, (secs. 753, 754, 755, C.O.S. 1931), provide a separate and distinct method of procedure by garnishment after execution is returned unsatisfied, by which the judgment creditor may reach garnishable property of the judgment debtor, or debts owing to him, when held in the hands of another in any county where the same may be found or held, and the district court of the county where the judgment was rendered acquires jurisdiction to reach such property, debts, or assets in any other county and to apply the same towards the satisfaction of the judgment, where the judgment creditor proceeds in conformity with the requirements of those sections in order to give the court jurisdiction in the matter.

3. SAME-- Order of court for garnishment to pay money into court--Error of court in refusal to permit judgment debtor on motion to vacate order to show execution was not issued and returned in good faith.

Where judgment creditor, after execution returned "nothing found," by a garnishment proceeding under sections 500, 501, and 502, O. S. 1931, garnisheed the bank account of the judgment debtor, and the trial court ordered the garnishee to pay the money into court, it was error for the trial court, on motion to vacate the order filed within the term, to refuse to permit the judgment debtor to show that the execution was not issued and returned in good faith, and that no attempt was made to levy such execution upon its property.

Appeal from District Court, Grady County; Will Linn, Judge.

Action by the Citizens-Farmers National Bank of Chickasha against the Voss Truck Lines, Inc.; garnishment in aid of execution returned unsatisfied. Motions of defendant to discharge garnishment and to vacate order for garnishee to pay money into court denied, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

Lee G. Gill and Chas. D. Scales, both of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

D. M. Cavaness and Melton, McElroy & Vaughn, all of Chickasha, for defendant in error.

HURST, J.

¶1 The Citizens-Farmers National Bank of Chickasha recovered money judgment against Voss Truck Lines and issued execution, which was returned "no property found." It then garnisheed the First National Bank & Trust Company of Oklahoma City, which answered admitting that defendant had in its checking account money in excess of the amount of the judgment. The trial court thereupon entered an order sustaining the garnishment and directing the bank to pay into court the amount of plaintiff's judgment. On the day following the making of this order, defendant filed a motion to discharge the garnishment, and thereafter filed a motion to set aside the order to pay the amount of the judgment into court. Plaintiff filed motions to strike both pleadings. On a hearing, the court denied the motions of defendant, and sustained those of plaintiff, and from these rulings defendant appeals.

1. Defendant's first contention is that the trial court did not have jurisdiction of the garnishee, or of the
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 practice notes
  • Juneau Spruce Corp. v. INTERNATIONAL L. & W. UNION, Civ. No. 1409.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Hawaii)
    • May 19, 1955
    ...is overwhelming that a writ of garnishment is a process of court. Voss Truck Lines v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 1940, 187 Okl. 289, 102 P.2d 173; Boyd v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co., 1861, 17 Md. 195, 210; Hinkley v. St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co., 9 Minn. 55, Gil 44; Hannibal & St. Jo......
  • Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. Rose, Case Number: 32046
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • February 19, 1946
    ...the commencement of an action or before execution has been returned unsatisfied. Voss Truck Lines, Inc., v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 187 Okla. 289, 102 P.2d 173. The statute in garnishment proceeding in aid of execution, 12 O. S. 1941 § 863, as above pointed out, does not require the ser......
  • La Bellman v. Gleason & Sanders, Inc., No. 39350
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • October 4, 1966
    ...As this did not occur in this case, these sections are inapplicable. Voss Truck Lines v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 187 Okl. 289, 102 P.2d 173; First Nat'l Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank, 174 Okl. 545, 51 P.2d In conclusion, the defendant urges that proper disposition of this case r......
  • Educators Auto. Ins. Co. v. Jones, No. 41555
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • May 16, 1967
    ...contained therein, was a sufficient compliance with the statute.' Voss Truck Lines v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 187 Okl. 289, 290, 102 P.2d 173, 175. Both the cited case and the present case are distinguishable from First Nat. Bank of Healdton v. Halback, 160 Okl. 82, 15 P.2d 586, because......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Juneau Spruce Corp. v. INTERNATIONAL L. & W. UNION, Civ. No. 1409.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Hawaii)
    • May 19, 1955
    ...is overwhelming that a writ of garnishment is a process of court. Voss Truck Lines v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 1940, 187 Okl. 289, 102 P.2d 173; Boyd v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co., 1861, 17 Md. 195, 210; Hinkley v. St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co., 9 Minn. 55, Gil 44; Hannibal & St. Jo......
  • Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. Rose, Case Number: 32046
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • February 19, 1946
    ...the commencement of an action or before execution has been returned unsatisfied. Voss Truck Lines, Inc., v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 187 Okla. 289, 102 P.2d 173. The statute in garnishment proceeding in aid of execution, 12 O. S. 1941 § 863, as above pointed out, does not require the ser......
  • La Bellman v. Gleason & Sanders, Inc., No. 39350
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • October 4, 1966
    ...As this did not occur in this case, these sections are inapplicable. Voss Truck Lines v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 187 Okl. 289, 102 P.2d 173; First Nat'l Bank of Cordell v. City Guaranty Bank, 174 Okl. 545, 51 P.2d In conclusion, the defendant urges that proper disposition of this case r......
  • Educators Auto. Ins. Co. v. Jones, No. 41555
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • May 16, 1967
    ...contained therein, was a sufficient compliance with the statute.' Voss Truck Lines v. Citizens-Farmers Nat. Bank, 187 Okl. 289, 290, 102 P.2d 173, 175. Both the cited case and the present case are distinguishable from First Nat. Bank of Healdton v. Halback, 160 Okl. 82, 15 P.2d 586, because......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT