Vratsenes v. N. H. Auto, Inc., 6295
Decision Date | 07 March 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 6295,6295 |
Citation | 289 A.2d 66,112 N.H. 71 |
Parties | John VRATSENES v. N.H. AUTO, INC. d/b/a Kilgus Pontiac-Cadillac et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Emile R. Bussiere and Kenneth R. McHugh, Manchester, for plaintiff.
Upton, Sanders & Upton, Concord, and John J. Sobol, for defendants.
Action of trespass against N.H. Auto, Inc. and George Kilgus alleging a willful and malicious entry on June 1, 1970 on plaintiff's land in Manchester and seeking punitive and compensatory damages. Plaintiff's declaration alleges that the defendants removed bushes growing on his premises and changed the character of his property against his wishes in order to enhance defendants' adjoining property. Plaintiff alleges further that 'such trespass was particularly willful and malicious in that on a previous occasion, to wit on September 4, 1968, a trespass was committed of a similar nature which resulted in a claim and which therefore notified the defendants of the plaintiff's resentment.'
Hearing before Capistran, J. who granted defendants' motion to dismiss that part of plaintiff's claim seeking punitive damages and returned a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of one dollar. Plaintiff's exceptions thereto were reserved and transferred to this court under the provisions of RSA 507-A:17-a (supp).
The issue before us on this appeal is whether punitive or exemplary damages can be awarded in this jurisdiction in the present action.
'Exemplary, or punitive, damages are generally defined or described as damages which are given as an enhancement of compensatory damages because of the wanton, reckless, malicious, or oppressive character of the acts. . . .' 22 Am.Jur.2d Damages s. 236 (1965). These terms are used interchangeably in most jurisdictions. Typical of torts for which such damages are awarded are assault and battery, libel and slander, deceit, malicious prosecution, and intentional interferences with property such as trespass. Prosser, Law of Torts s. 2, at 10 (4th ed. 1971).
In most jurisdictions exemplary damages are allowed and awarded not by way of compensation but as a punishment to the defendant and as a warning and example to deter him and others from committing like offenses in the future. Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 161, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094, 1114-1115, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 1994-1995 (1967); Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1968); Riegel v. Aastad, 272 A.2d 715 (Del.1970); Eshelman v. Rawalt, 298 Ill. 192, 131 N.E. 675 (1921); 70 Harv.L.Rev. 517, 521, 522 (1957).
However, in New Hampshire, the punitive function of exemplary damages has been rejected in forceful and colorful language. Fay v. Parker, 53 N.H. 342, 382 (1872). This anathema is found in less vitriolic language in Bruton v. Leavitt Stores Corporation, 87 N.H. 304, 179 A. 185 (1935). Nevertheless, this court in Fay v. Parker supra, and more particularly in Bixby v. Dunlap, 56 N.H. 456, 462 (1876), has recognized that in cases where the acts complained of were wanton, malicious, or oppressive, the compensatory damages for the resulting actual material loss can be increased to compensate for the vexation and distress caused the plaintiff by the character of defendant's conduct.
This same principle has been expressed in the following language: Kimball v. Holmes, 60 N.H. 163, 164 (1880); Friel v. Plumer, 69 N.H. 498, 500, 43 A. 618, 619 (1898). The rule in these cases has been restated recently as being different and more liberal. Hahn v. Hemenway, 96 N.H. 214, 72 A.2d 463 (1950); Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp., 103 N.H. 426, 174 A.2d 825 (1961); 41 B.U.L.Rev. 389 (1961).
The above...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tuttle v. Raymond
...825, 831-32 (1967) ("punitive" damages are compensatory in function, and may not exceed costs of litigation); Vratsenes v. N.H. Auto, Inc., 112 N.H. 71, 73, 289 A.2d 66, 68 (1972) ("no damages other than compensatory are to be We find, however, that the extra recovery afforded to plaintiffs......
-
Godfrey v. Perkin-Elmer Corp.
...or oppressive, the compensatory damages awarded may reflect the aggravating circumstances.'" Id. (quoting Vratsenes v. N.H. Auto, Inc., 112 N.H. 71, 73, 289 A.2d 66, 68 (1972)). The mere involvement of a tort, however, even if intentional, is insufficient in this regard. Id. There must be "......
-
State v. Hynes
...Enhanced compensatory damages are, as their name indicates, compensatory and not punitive in nature. See Vratsenes v. N.H. Auto, Inc., 112 N.H. 71, 73, 289 A.2d 66 (1972). Thus, by incorporating the idea of compensation into each monetary remedy payable to the public accommodation claimant,......
-
Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello
...to equitable relief; joint venturers fraudulently induced investment and breached fiduciary duty). See also Vratsenes v. N.H. Auto, Inc., 112 N.H. 71, 289 A.2d 66, 68 (1972) ("[N]o damages other than compensatory are to be awarded. However, when the act involved is wanton, malicious, or opp......
-
Jury Awards Over $31 Million To Former Wal-Mart EmployeeBut Wal-Mart Probably Won't Have To Pay Most Of It
...the plaintiff "for the vexation and distress caused the plaintiff by the character of defendant's conduct." Vratsenes v. N.H. Auto, Inc., 289 A.2d 66, 72 (N.H. 1972). The jury here was instructed that "enhanced damages, unlike punitive damages, may not be awarded in an effort to punish the ......
-
Punishing Corporations: the Food-chain Schizophrenia in Punitive Damages and Criminal Law
...696 A.2d 530, 534-35 (N.H. 1997); State v. Pinardville Athletic Club, 594 A.2d 1284, 1286 (N.H. 1991). 116. Vratsenes v. N. H. Auto, Inc., 289 A.2d 66, 67-68 (N.H. 1972); Bixby v. Dunlap, 56 N.H. 456, 463, 1876 WL 5269, at *6 (N.H. 1876) (following Goddard); Hopkins v. Atl. and Saint Lawren......
-
The Damages of Caps in Nebraska
...jurisdiction, absent statutory authorization."). [46] N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 507:16 (2020). [47]See, e.g., Vratsenes v. N.H. Auto, Inc., 289 A.2d 66, 67 (N.H. [48]See, e.g., Gilroy v. Conway, 391 N.W.2d 419, 422 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986) ("In Michigan, however, the purpose of exemplary damages ......