W. F. Bradley Lumber Co. v. Crowell, 3 Div. 237

Decision Date02 December 1937
Docket Number3 Div. 237
PartiesW.F. BRADLEY LUMBER COMPANY v. Harry CROWELL, Jr., pro aml.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1938

Certiorari to Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Chas. M. Pinkston and Thomas & Thomas, all of Montgomery, for petitioner.

Rushton, Crenshaw & Rushton, of Montgomery, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of Harry Crowell, Jr., by his father and next friend, Harry Crowell, Sr., for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Bradley Lumber Co. v. Crowell, 178 So. 66.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C.J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Green
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1964
    ...Tenn. Coal, Iron & R. Co., 191 Ala. 646, 68 So. 154. See, also, W. F. Bradley Lumber Co. v. Crowell, 178 So. 66, certiorari denied 235 Ala. 223, 178 So. 68. 'And we have held the doctrine of the 'turntable' cases is inapplicable where the danger is obvious and patent. Williams v. Bolding, 2......
  • Luallen v. Woodstock Iron & Steel Corporation
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 6, 1938
    ... ... WOODSTOCK IRON & STEEL CORPORATION. 7 Div. 485.Supreme Court of AlabamaOctober 6, 1938 ... Ala. 646, 68 So. 154. See, also, W. F. Bradley Lumber Co ... v. Crowell, Ala. App., 178 So ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT