W.H.I., Inc. v. Courter
Decision Date | 01 May 2018 |
Docket Number | C.A. No. WC-2015-0463 |
Parties | W.H.I., INC., Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim, v. JAMES COURTER; SORGENFREI, LLC, Defendants, Plaintiffs in Counterclaim, and Third Party Plaintiffs, - and - JVLV REALTY, INC.; HOWARD L. HARONIAN, M.D.; HJM LLC; JAMES & LYNN VALLIDES; and SALLY MERRY, Involuntary Plaintiffs in Counterclaim, - and - JVLV REALTY, INC.; HOWARD L. HARONIAN, M.D.; HJM LLC; JAMES & LYNN VALLIDES; and SALLY MERRY, Involuntary Third Party Plaintiffs - and - MERRILL LYNCH CREDIT CORPORATION; DIME BANK; Parties-In-Interest, v. PETER V. CATALANO; WATCH HILL INN HOTEL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION (a.k.a. WATCH HILL INN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION); WATCH HILL PROPERTIES, LLC; and WHI PARKING, LLC. Third Party Defendants. |
Court | Rhode Island Superior Court |
STERN, J. Defendants/Plaintiffs in Counterclaim/Third Party Plaintiffs James Courter (Courter) and Sorgenfrei, LLC (Sorgenfrei), together with Involuntary Plaintiffs in Counterclaim/Involuntary Third Party Plaintiffs JVLV Realty, Inc. (JVLV), Howard L. Haronian, M.D. (Dr. Haronian), James and Lynn Vallides (the Vallideses), and Sally Merry (Merry) (collectively, the Unit Owners), move for partial summary judgment against Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant W.H.I., Inc. (WHI or Declarant), Third Party Defendant Peter V. Catalano (Catalano), and Third Party Defendant WHI Parking, LLC (WHI Parking), a wholly owned subsidiary of WHI (collectively, Plaintiffs). Specifically, the Unit Owners claim that there are no genuine issues of material fact with respect to parking-related issues raised in their memorandum. In response, Plaintiffs object to the Unit Owners' motion and also move for summary judgment, seeking a declaration that the Parking Management Agreement (the PMA) and the Cross Easement are valid and binding, and that all claims asserted against Catalano in his individual capacity be dismissed. Jurisdiction is pursuant to Super. R. Civ. P. 56(c) and G.L. 1956 §§ 9-30-1 et seq.
The underlying facts of this case have been set forth in this Court's July 24, 2017 Decision. See W.H.I., Inc. v. Courter, No. WC-2015-0463, 2017 WL 3209052 (R.I. Super. July 24, 2017). Relevant to this Decision are the facts surrounding the parking and easement-related issues in the present motion.
On December 23, 1985, WHI formally purchased the property in dispute, located at 38 Bay Street in Westerly, Rhode Island, and created the Watch Hill Inn Condominium (WHIC). Catalano Aff. ¶ 4, Oct. 26, 2017. WHI is the declarant of that certain Declaration of Condominium recorded in the Land Evidence Records of the Town of Westerly on February 17, 2006 in Book 1504, at Page 176 (the Declaration), the same which was amended on July 7, 2006 and recorded in the Land Evidence Records in Book 1550, at Page 187 (the First Amended Declaration). Id. at ¶ 2. WHI currently owns—and has owned since the Declaration's inception—five units at WHIC: W201, W202, W203, W402, and W501. Id. at ¶ 3. The Watch Hill Inn Condominium Association (WHICA) is a condominium association that was created by the Declaration and governs the units located at WHIC. Id. at ¶ 4.
From 1986 to 2005, Watch Hill Inn was renovated and upgraded to include sixteen efficiency hotel units, one residential apartment, a banquet facility for 200 persons, and an indoor/outdoor restaurant for 180 patrons. Id. at ¶ 5. After the Watch Hill Inn was cited for sixty-five violations under the Rhode Island Fire Codes, it was forced to shut down to conform to the new regulations. Catalano Aff. ¶ 9, June 1, 2017. WHI appealed to the State of Rhode Island Rehab Board and was eventually approved for a continued, nonconforming "mixed-use status." Id. at ¶ 10. RGB Architects (RGB) then prepared the condominium plans and specifications, which were subsequently filed with the Town of Westerly Building and Zoning Departments, the Department of Environmental Management (DEM), Historic Landmark Preservations, and Coastal Resources. Catalano Aff. ¶ 6, Oct. 26, 2017. Due to these new regulations, WHI was approved for eleven units consisting of ten residential dwelling units and one restaurant. Id.
The Town of Westerly adopted Article XI, § 260-77—a parking regulation zoning ordinance—on October 16, 1998 in Chapter Number 1242, and readopted on May 12, 2003 in Chapter Number 1439 (the Zoning Ordinance). Specifically, the Zoning Ordinance states:
On March 15, 2005, RGB prepared a site plan for Declarant with respect to the WHIC property (the RGB Parking Plan). The RGB Parking Plan identified twenty-three total spaces on the WHIC property, which were two handicapped spaces, three non-valet spaces, and eighteen valet spaces. Unit Owners' Mot., Ex. G. The RGB Parking Plan further regulated the non-handicapped parking spaces as follows: ten parking spaces were assigned to ten hotel units (one parking space per one hotel unit), eight parking spaces were designated for patrons at the restaurant (one parking space per four seats in a thirty-seat restaurant), and three parking spaces were designated for the restaurant's employees (one parking space per three employees in a nine-employee restaurant). Id. Essentially, the RGB Parking Plan complied with § 260-77(A)(2) of the Zoning Ordinance, thus recognizing the WHIC property at the time as a hotel, motel, or inn. See Unit Owners' Mot., Ex. F. The RGB Parking Plan predated the formation of the WHICA byseveral months. See Unit Owners' Mot., Ex. G; Pls.' Mem. in Obj. to Partial Summ. J. and in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J. (WHI's Mot.), Ex. 1.
Additionally, WHI submitted a separate site plan for approval by the Town of Westerly dated October 12, 2005 relating to the WHIC property; this plan was approved by the Westerly Zoning Officer on November 4, 2005. This plan contained a parking plan which identified sixteen parking spaces on the WHIC property (the Town-Approved Parking Plan). Unit Owners' Mot., Ex. H. According to Declarant, these sixteen on-site compact "stacked" parking spaces were used primarily for the restaurant staff and also contained three required handicap spaces. Catalano Aff. ¶ 5, Oct. 26, 2017. The Town-Approved Parking Plan was in effect until July 21, 2006, when a subsequent plan was required with the First Amended Declaration. Id. at 7. According to the Unit Owners, however, a subsequent plan for parking was never filed.
The PMA is a lease with an initial term of forty-nine years with unlimited five-year options. With respect to the parking management services, the PMA stated in part:
To continue reading
Request your trial