W. R. Ferguson, Inc. v. William A. Berbusse, Jr., Inc.
Citation | 59 Del. 229,216 A.2d 876,9 Storey 229 |
Parties | , 59 Del. 229 W. R. FERGUSON, INC., a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM A. BERBUSSE, JR., INC., a corporation of the State of New York, Defendant. |
Decision Date | 07 February 1966 |
Court | Superior Court of Delaware |
Albert L. Simon, Wilmington, for plaintiff.
Bruce M. Stargatt, and Ben T. Castle (of Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor), Wilmington, for defendant.
This action is the result of a dispute over a construction contract. The contract executed by the plaintiff as a sub-contractor and the defendant as contractor was for the performance of work on the St. Francis Hospital at Wilmington, Delaware. The plaintiff's claim is for an alleged unpaid balance under the term of the contract and for extra work not specifically provided for under the contract.
The defendant moves to dismiss the action or alternatively for judgment on the pleadings as to certain parts of the action.
The motion to dismiss is based on the failure of the plaintiff to submit the matter to arbitration. The pertinent section of the contract in connection with this contention provides:
The plaintiff contends that the defendant has waived its right to rely on the arbitration clause by (1) filing an answer and counterclaim without asserting the arbitration clause and (2) disregarding the arbitration provision in prior dealings with the plaintiff. There is not before me at this stage. enough of a record to merit discussion of plaintiff's second point but the initial contention is worthy of consideration.
In opposition to this contention the defendant relies on three cases which are not in point. In Shribman v. Miller, 60 N.J.Super. 182, 158 A.2d 432 (1960) arbitration was raised in the answer as an affirmative defense. In Wymard v. McCloskey & Co., 190 F.Supp. 420 (D.C.Pa.1960) Affd. 292 F.2d 839 (C.A. 3 1961) and Formigli Corporation v. Alcar Builders, Inc., 329 F.2d 79 (C.A. 3 1964) the arbitration question was raised by the defendants by motion prior to answer.
The defendant also emphasizes the fact that the clause at bar makes arbitration a condition precedent to legal action. No Delaware case in point has been found and the cases cited by the plaintiff do not generally deal with the condition precedent type clause.
Independent School District No. 35, St. Louis County v. A. Hedenberg & Co., 214 Minn. 82, 7 N.W.2d 511 (1943) dealt with this precise question. The Court there treated the arbitration clause as it would have any other clause in the contract recognizing that it was not self-executing and like other parts of the contract could be modified, rescinded or waived by the parties' agreements, acts or conduct. The Court also said:
In The Batter Building Materials Company v. Kirschner, 142 Conn. 1, 110 A.2d 464 (1954) the court was confronted with the same clause that exists in the present case. While the court declined to find a waiver the possibility that a waiver might exist was recognized. See also Zimmerman v. Cohen, 236 N.Y. 15, 139 N.E. 764 (1923).
It seems clear that the arbitration clause presently before the court may be waived. I now turn to the question of whether or not there has been a waiver.
The complaint was filed September 9, 1964. The defendant answered on September 24, 1964. The answer contained a general denial, two affirmative defenses (not connected with arbitration), and a counterclaim. Both parties served interrogatories upon the other which were answered. On June 25, 1965, the defendant filed this motion. Thus the matter of arbitration was first raised by the defendant some 9 1/2...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Unifirst Corporation v. Holloway's Trucking, No. 06-07-003 (Del.Gen.Sess. 8/5/2009)
...3 N.Y.2d 395, 403. 7. Ballenger v. Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. 2002 WL 749162 (Del. Ch.); W.R. Ferguson, Inc. v. William A. Berbusse, Jr., Inc. 9 Storey 229, 216 A.2d 876 (Del. Super., 1966); Wilshire Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Ramada Inc., 1990 WL 195910 (Del. Ch.); Zaret v. Warners Mov......
-
Spratley v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
...inconsistencies of a contract be resolved without elimination of any contract provisions. W.R. Ferguson, Inc. v. William A. Berbusse, Jr., Inc., 9 Storey 229, 59 Del. 229, 216 A.2d 876, 877 (1966). Therefore, when interpreting the "Other Insurance" clause I must interpret the provisions the......
-
FD Rich Co. v. Wilmington Housing Authority, 16794.
...Contractor for adjustment hereunder shall be allowed unless he has given notice as above required." 12 Cf. W. R. Ferguson, Inc. v. William A. Berbusse, Jr., Inc., 216 A.2d 876, 879 (Super.Ct. of Del.1966); Macri v. United States, 353 F.2d 804 (9 Cir. 1965); Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United......
-
Pullman, Inc. v. Phoenix Steel Corp.
...arbitration shall be invoked 'after a reasonable time not exceeding one (1) month'. This case is distinguishable from Ferguson v. Berbusse, 216 A.2d 876 (Del.Super.1966), where it was held that a delay of 9 and one-half months in asserting a right to arbitration after the defendant filed it......