W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Ellis
Decision Date | 11 February 1918 |
Docket Number | (No. 155.) |
Parties | W. T. RAWLEIGH MEDICAL CO. v. ELLIS et al. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Ouachita County; Chas. W. Smith, Judge.
Action by the W. T. Rawleigh Medical Company against E. P. Ellis and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed and rendered.
J. W. Warren, of Camden, for appellant. Thos. W. Hardy, of Camden, for appellees.
The parties to this litigation entered into the following contract:
Pursuant to the terms of this contract, merchandise of the kind there named was furnished to E. P. Ellis, and, after all proper credits had been given and allowed, there finally remained due the sum of $269.96, for which sum a note was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Watson v. J. R. Watkins Co
... ... 140, 180 S.W. 21; ... Dr. Koch Veg. Tea Co. v. Malone. (Tex.), 163 S.W ... 663; Saginaw Medical Co. v. Batey (Mich.), 146 N.W ... 329; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Holloway (Mo.), 168 S.W ... 290; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Hague (Ark.), 210 S.W ... 628; W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Holcomb (Ark.), 191 S.W ... 214; W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Ellis (Ark.), 201 S.W ... 110; E ... ...
-
W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Rose
... ... Appellee concedes that the written contract is identical with the contract passed on by this court in the recent case of W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Ellis, 201 S. W. 110, and for that reason, does not longer urge that the written contract constitutes one of principal and agency. In that case, this court held that a contract indentical with this was not ambiguous and that it constituted a contract of sale and purchase. In support of its decision, the ... ...
- W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Ellis