Wabaunsee County Com'rs v. Bisby
Decision Date | 08 October 1887 |
Citation | 15 P. 241,37 Kan. 253 |
Parties | THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF WABAUNSEE COUNTY v. J. M. BISBY |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Error from Wabaunsee District Court.
APPEAL by Bisby to the district court from the allowance of damages by the county board of Wabaunsee county on account of the establishment of a public road over plaintiff's land. Trial by the court at the March Term, 1885, and judgment for the plaintiff for $ 99.40 damages, and $ 60.65 costs. The County brings the case here.
Judgment affirmed.
W. A Doolittle, county attorney, for plaintiff in error.
H. A Pierce, for defendant in error.
OPINION
The only errors complained of in this case are: First, that the court erred in refusing to allow the defendant to introduce in evidence the township record, tending to show a location and establishment of a public road through plaintiff's land in 1859; second, the court erred in refusing to admit in evidence the record of the county clerk, tending to show the location of a public road over a part of the plaintiff's land in 1868; and third, that the judgment ought to have been for the defendant below instead of for the plaintiff. The statute under which this appeal was taken is as follows:
(Comp. Laws of 1885, ch. 89, § 7.)
Under this provision the only thing that the district court had jurisdiction to hear and determine was, the amount of damages plaintiff was entitled to; nothing else. The location and establishment of the road was final when it was located and established by the board of county commissioners. Then only such...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Burke v. The City of Kansas
...In such cases the title is not in issue and is not before the court and cannot be adjudicated. Wright v. Town, 64 Mo. 165; Commissioners v. Bisby, 37 Kan. 253; San Jose v. Reed, 65 Cal. 241; Railroad v. Mud Creek Co., 1 Tex.App. Civil Cas. 169; Queen v. London, etc., Railroad, 3 Ellis & Bl.......
-
Flemming v. The Board of County Commissioners of The County of Ellsworth
... ... that no road existed over the route described, or any part of ... it. (Comm'rs of Wabaunsee County v ... Bisby, 37 Kan. 253, 15 P. 241; Cowley County v ... Hooker, 70 Kan. 372, 78 P. 847; ... ...
-
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Williams
... ... operation of its road at the station of Rexford, Thomas ... county, this state, to be the owner and to maintain a depot, ... depot platform, ... will show. For example, in the case of Com'rs of ... Wabaunsee Co. v. Bisby, 37 Kan. 253, 15 P. 241, there ... was an attempt to take ... ...
-
Briggs v. Labette County Com'rs
... ... final. The appeal was taken on the question of damages alone ... See Comm'rs of Wabaunsee Co. v. Bisby, ... 37 Kan. 253: In that case the court sought to show that years ... before a ... ...