Wada v. Aloha King, LLC
| Decision Date | 23 December 2015 |
| Docket Number | CIVIL NO. 14-00275 HG-BMK |
| Citation | 154 F.Supp.3d 981 |
| Parties | Maho Wada; Masahiro Wada, Plaintiffs, v. Aloha King, LLC ; Total Storage Solutions ; TNT Self Storage Management, Inc. ; ABSO; Sterlingbackcheck; Doe Defendants 1-20, Defendants. Aloha King, LLC, Cross-Claimant, v. TNT Self Storage Management, Inc. ; Total Storage Solutions ; ABSO; Sterlingbackcheck, Cross-Defendants. Total Storage Solutions, Cross-Claimant, v. Aloha King, LLC ; ABSO; Sterlingbackcheck, Cross-Defendants. TNT Self Storage Management, Inc., Cross-Claimant, v. Aloha King, LLC ; ABSO; Sterlingbackcheck, Cross-Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii |
Andrew D. Stewart, Showa Law Office, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiffs.
Matt A. Tsukazaki, Phillip A. Li, Li & Tsukazaki, J. Patrick Gallagher, Gallagher Kane Amai, Trish K. Morikawa, Office Of The United States Attorney, Michiro Iwanaga, Sakai Iwanaga Sutton Law Group, Anne T. Horiuchi, Barbara A. Petrus, Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel LLP, Honolulu, HI, Laura J. Maechtlen, Selyn Hong, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, San Francisco, CA, Pamela Q. Devata, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant/Cross-Claimant/ Cross-Defendants.
and
and
and
Plaintiff Masahiro Wada claims that in 2009 he rented a storage unit at a Honolulu storage facility owned by Defendant
Aloha King, LLC. Plaintiff Masahiro Wada alleges that his fifteen year-old daughter, Plaintiff Maho Wada, was sexually assaulted by Dale McShane, the manager of Defendant Aloha King, LLC's storage facility.
Plaintiffs assert that Defendant TNT Self Storage Management, Inc. managed the storage facility for Defendant Aloha King, LLC, and contracted with Defendant Total Storage Solutions for the facility's personnel and staffing matters.
Plaintiffs assert that Defendant Total Storage Solutions contracted for Defendant Abso to conduct a background check on Dale McShane, but Defendant Abso did not disclose that McShane had a criminal record and was a registered sex offender.
On July 21, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 73), naming the following Defendants:
There are three separate Crossclaims filed against Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck.
Cross-Claimant TSS Staffing Agent filed a Crossclaim against Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck with the following causes of action:
(Cross-Claimant TSS Staffing Agent's Crossclaim, ECF No. 87).
Cross-Claimant TNT Management filed a Crossclaim against Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck for contribution and indemnification. (Defendant TNT Management's Crossclaim, ECF No. 89-1).
Cross-Claimant Aloha King has also filed a Crossclaim against Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck for contribution and indemnification. (Defendant Aloha King's Crossclaim, ECF No. 109-1).
Defendants/Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck have filed the following four Motions before the Court:
1. Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 99)
Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck have filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiffs. Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck assert in their Motion to Dismiss that Plaintiffs' claims are preempted by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck argue that Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck argue that, even if the claims are not preempted, Plaintiffs' claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations and Plaintiffs have not otherwise stated a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 99) is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND .
2. Cross-Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss TSS Staffing Agent's Crossclaim (ECF No. 100)
Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck assert in their Motion that Cross-Claimant TSS Staffing Agent's claims for breach of contract, negligence, indemnification, and contribution are preempted by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck assert that the allegations in TSS Staffing Agent's Crossclaim do not state a claim pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck argue that, even if the claims are not preempted, TSS Staffing Agent has not provided sufficient allegations to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck also assert that TSS Staffing Agent's claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.
Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck also argue that TSS Staffing Agent's tort claims are barred by the economic loss doctrine.
Cross-Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss the Crossclaims filed by Cross-Claimant TSS Staffing Agent (ECF No. 100) is GRANTED, IN PART, AND DENIED, IN PART, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND .
3. Cross-Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss the Crossclaim filed by TNT Management (ECF No. 101)
Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck filed a Motion to Dismiss TNT Management's Crossclaim for indemnification and contribution. Cross-Defendants argue that TNT Management's Crossclaim does not contain sufficient facts to state a claim. They also argue that TNT Management's claims are barred by the economic loss rule.
Cross-Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss the Crossclaims filed by Cross-Claimants TNT Management (ECF No. 101) is DENIED .
Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck filed a Motion to Dismiss Aloha King's Crossclaim for indemnification and contribution. Cross-Defendants argue there are insufficient allegations in the Crossclaim to state a claim for either indemnification or contribution.
Cross-Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss Crossclaim filed by Aloha King (ECF No. 120) is DENIED .
On June 17, 2014, Plaintiffs Maho and Masahiro Wada filed a Complaint against Defendants Aloha King, LLC (“Aloha King ”); Aloha Island-King, LLC; Total Storage Solutions (“TSS Staffing Agent ”); TNT Self Storage Management, Inc. (“TNT Management ”), and Doe Defendants 1-20. (ECF No. 1).
On September 17, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice as to Defendant Aloha-Island King, LLC. (ECF No. 16).
On March 17, 2015, Defendant TNT Management filed a Motion for Leave to File a Third-Party Complaint. (ECF No. 49).
On May 12, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order Granting Defendant TNT Management's Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint. (ECF No. 55).
On May 26, 2015, TNT Management, as a Third-Party Plaintiff, filed a Third-Party Complaint against Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck (“Abso ” or “Abso/SterlingBackcheck ”). (ECF No. 56).
On July 6, 2015, the Magistrate Judge approved a Stipulation among Plaintiffs and Defendants to permit Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 62).
On July 21, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, adding Abso/SterlingBackcheck as Defendants. (ECF No. 73).
On August 7, 2015, Cross-Claimant TSS Staffing Agent filed a Crossclaim against Cross-Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck. (ECF No. 87).
On August 10, 2015, Cross-Claimant TNT Management filed a Crossclaim against Cross-Defendants Aloha King and Abso/SterlingBackcheck. (ECF No. 89).
On September 4, 2015, Third-Party Plaintiff TNT Management filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice of its Third-Party Complaint against Third-Party Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck. (ECF No. 98).
On September 8, 2015, Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 99).
On the same date, Abso/SterlingBackcheck, as Cross-Defendants, filed a Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claimant TSS Staffing Agent's Crossclaims Filed August 7, 2015. (ECF No. 100).
They also filed Cross-Defendants Abso/STERLINGBACKCHECK'S Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claimant TNT Management's Crossclaims Filed August 10, 2015. (ECF No. 101).
On September 16, 2015, Cross-Claimant Aloha King filed Crossclaims against Defendants Abso/SterlingBackcheck, Cross-Defendant TNT Management, and Cross-Defendant TSS Staffing Agent. (ECF No. 109).
On September 23, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Memorandum...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Columbus Downtown Dev. Corp., Case No: 2:16–cv–557
...375 (9th Cir. 1955) ("[A] pleading of payment was not required because of the provisions in Rules 13 and 14."); Wada v. Aloha King, LLC, 154 F.Supp.3d 981, 1003 (D. Haw. 2015) (Rule 13(g)"does not require that the indemnification or contribution claims be mature at the time of pleading"); R......
-
Bennett v. Poipu Resort Partners, L.P.
...personal injury claims asserted by Bennett, and Bennett's claims are not exclusively for economic loss. See Wada v. Aloha King, LLC, 154 F. Supp. 3d 981, 1004 (D. Haw. 2015). The Owners do not appear to seek to recover from any "other property," that is, property other than the Bombay tiles......
-
Garot v. Cnty. of San Diego
...Rule 13(g), a cross-claim for indemnification or contribution need not be mature at the time of pleading. See Wada v. Aloha King, LLC, 154 F. Supp. 3d 981, 1003 (D. Haw. 2015); U.S. Bank, N.A. for Certificateholders of LXS 2007-16N Tr. v. Mar-A-Lago Homeowners Ass'n, No. 216CV00565GMNNJK, 2......
-
The Upper Deck Co. v. Flores
...and third-party claims contingent upon ultimate adjudication of claimant's liability to plaintiff.”); Wada v. Aloha King, LLC, 154 F.Supp.3d 981, 1003 (D. Haw. 2015) (“[a] crossclaim can be contingent upon the ultimate adjudication of the crossclaimant's liability to plaintiff.”). Therefore......