Wade v. Kay

Decision Date30 June 1923
Docket Number6 Div. 905.
Citation210 Ala. 122,97 So. 129
PartiesWADE v. KAY.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Blount County; O. A. Steele, Judge.

Petition of James Kay for allowance of solicitor's fee for services rendered to Celia E. Wade in the cause of Celia E Wade v. George L. Wade and others and establishment of a lien therefor on her distributive share of the estate of E. L Wade, deceased. From a decree overruling demurrers to the petition, respondent appeals. Affirmed.

Ward Nash & Fendley, of Oneonta, for appellant.

James Kay, of Oneonta, for appellee.

SOMERVILLE J.

Section 3011 of the Code gives a lien to attorneys on "suits, judgments, and decrees for money," for services rendered in reference thereto. Though the lien is given on suits as well as judgments and decrees it is clear that there can be no enforcement of such a lien until the suit has been prosecuted to judgment.

The petition here exhibited is but an appendage to the main proceeding-the administration of an estate; and though it does not allege that a decree had been rendered in that proceeding allotting to petitioner's client what she was due to receive from the estate, the trial court had before it the entire record in the case, and was bound to know that such a decree had, in fact, been rendered, and was bound to decree upon the demurrer to this petition in the light of that knowledge.

This court knows of the existence and the terms of that decree by the inspection of its own records in the case of Blount County Bk., as Adm'r of the Estate of Wade v. Kay (Ala. Sup.) 95 So. 297, involving this same administration wherein the final decree of the administering court is pertinently set forth. Ala. City, etc., Co. v. Bates, 155 Ala. 347, 46 So. 776.

The decree directs the administrator to pay:

"A. All costs and expenses of the administration of said estate, together with all legal liabilities, *** together with $2,000, to be paid to Mrs. C. E. Wade [the respondent herein] in lieu of the homestead, and to Mrs. C. E. Wade $100, balance due her on her personal property exemptions, and together with $250, *** to refund her for monies paid by her on debts of the decedent."

The decree also gives to Mrs. Wade a distributive share in the balance of the estate.

Courts of equity have a general jurisdiction for the enforcement of common-law liens, and also of statutory liens when the statute does not otherwise...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 24 Marzo 1932
    ...... . . It has. been declared by this court that under section 8935, Code,. any lien may be enforced in equity. McLendon v. Truckee. Land Co., 216 Ala. 589, 114 So. 3, an attorney's. lien; Broglan v. City of Huntsville, 218 Ala. 9, 117. So. 419, an assessment lien; Wade v. Kay, 210 Ala. 122, 97 So. 129, an attorney's lien; Wilkins v. Folsom, 208 Ala. 24, 93 So. 547, enforcement of a tax. lien; Rowe v. Bank of New Brockton, 207 Ala. 384, 92. So. 643, on shares of bank stock; Oden v. Vaughn, . 204 Ala. 445, 85 So. 779, to compel transfer of corporate. ......
  • Frazer v. First Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 20 Enero 1938
    ...115 So. 21; Cartwright v. Hughes, 226 Ala. 464, 147 So. 399; Nashville C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Crosby, 194 Ala. 338, 70 So. 7; Wade v. Kay, 210 Ala. 122, 97 So. 129; City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. Bates, 155 Ala. 347, 46 So. 776, and McGowin v. McGowin, 232 Ala. 601, 169 So. 232. Such a reference t......
  • Cartwright v. Hughes
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 9 Marzo 1933
    ...part of the judgment which was reversed on the former appeal. Alabama City G. & A. R. Co. v. Bates, 155 Ala. 347, 46 So. 776; Wade v. Kay, 210 Ala. 122, 97 So. 129. The appeal is shown in 222 Ala. 4, 130 So. 550. After a reversal and remandment, there was no further ruling on pleadings. But......
  • Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • 17 Agosto 1972
    ...So. 441; Alabama Water Co. v. City of Anniston, 227 Ala. 579, 151 So. 457; Cartwright v. Hughes, 226 Ala. 464, 147 So. 399; Wade v. Kay, 210 Ala. 122, 97 So. 129. The records of this court show that on January 17, 1969, F.D.I.C. filed with the Register of the Circuit Court of Wilcox County,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT