Wadsworth House Movers, Inc. v. Salvage One Demolition, Inc.

Decision Date19 July 1985
Citation474 So.2d 686
PartiesWADSWORTH HOUSE MOVERS, INC., a corporation v. SALVAGE ONE DEMOLITION, INC. 84-264.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

James W. May, Gulf Shores, for appellant.

George M. Ritchey of Ritchey & Ritchey, Birmingham, for appellee.

BEATTY, Justice.

Appeal by Wadsworth House Movers, Inc., defendant, from a judgment in favor of Salvage One Demolition, Inc. (Salvage One), in Salvage One's action based upon breach of contract, money had and received, and fraudulent misrepresentation. The case was tried ore tenus without a jury, and the plaintiff was awarded $11,900 in damages. We affirm.

The action grew out of negotiations between the parties whereby Salvage One sought to purchase Wadsworth House Movers, Inc., a house moving business owned by Wayne Wadsworth. In the course of these negotiations, an agreement was prepared by Salvage One's lawyer. At a meeting in the lawyer's office, details of the transaction were discussed; however, the agreement was not executed by either party. There were other meetings held, without a final closing occurring. Then, on June 15, 1981, Wadsworth went to the office of James Allred, owner of Salvage One and one of the participants in the negotiations, to further discuss the proposed purchase. While there, Wadsworth received a $10,000 cashier's check, for which he gave a receipt, which recited that the $10,000 was "toward purchase of Wadsworth House Movers, Inc., leaving balance of $44,521 due 6/20/81." The closing to occur on June 20 did not occur; at trial the parties disagreed as to where it was to have taken place. No further negotiations were held, and no documents of sale were executed. Wadsworth did not return the $10,000 payment to Salvage One.

Following the trial court's judgment, the defendant's post-trial motions were denied and this appeal ensued.

The defendant states the issue as being whether the vendee may recover a partial payment made under an agreement of purchase and sale when the vendor is able and willing to perform his agreement. The plaintiff, on the other hand, views the case as one in which the trial court, sitting without a jury, could have found that no contract of sale was ever entered into by the parties and that Salvage One was thus entitled to a return of its down payment. We agree with that position and find that the evidence lends support to the trial court's judgment.

The transaction concerned certain equipment, some detached houses, and reimbursement to Wadsworth of sums he had invested in houses he had bid upon, and payment of promissory notes Wadsworth owed to banks. As we have stated, no written contract was ever executed by either party. Wayne Wadsworth did execute a receipt, but only in his individual capacity, and not as a representative of Wadsworth House...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Graves v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • October 12, 2017
  • Hines v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • February 14, 2012
  • Donahoo v. State, 7 Div. 977
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • September 29, 1989
  • White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. Prs II, LLC
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 18, 2008
    ...the Group's brief, at 52, the cases it cites, namely, Ex parte W.Y., 605 So.2d 1175 (Ala.1992); Wadsworth House Movers, Inc. v. Salvage One Demolition, Inc., 474 So.2d 686 (Ala.1985) (alleged oral agreement); Johnson-Rast & Hays, Inc. v. Cole, 294 Ala. 32, 310 So.2d 885 (1975); and Big Thic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT