Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Ass'n v. Guiswite, 1247 MDA 2017
Decision Date | 19 October 2018 |
Docket Number | No. 1247 MDA 2017,1247 MDA 2017 |
Citation | 197 A.3d 1243 |
Parties | WAG-MYR WOODLANDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, BY David MORGAN as Trustee Ad Litem, Appellant v. John L. GUISWITE and Michelle P. Guiswite, Thomas H. Jeffries and Shirley A. Jeffries, Judy A. Heimbach and Joan A. Stearns, as Co-Executrices of the Estate of James D. Holman, Deceased, Joan A. Stearns, Gayle N. Phillips, Betsy A. Phillips, Jeffrey A. Corson, Mary Ann McHale, Ronnie L. DeWalt, Melissa T. DeWalt, Anthony J. Hayes and Meredith L. Hayes |
Court | Pennsylvania Superior Court |
Justin K. Houser, Lock Haven, for appellant.
Marc S. Drier, Jersey Shore, for Hayes, A. & M., appellees.
James N. Bryant, Millheim, for Stearns, Phillips, G., Phillips, B., Corson, Guiswite, J., Guiswite, M., Heimbach, McHale, DeWalt, R., DeWalt, M., and Jeffreies, appellees.
Appellant Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Association,1 by David Morgan as Trustee ad Litem ,2 appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Appellees John L. and Michelle P. Guiswite, Thomas H. and Shirley A. Jeffries, Judy A. Heimbach and Joan A. Stearns, as co-executrices of the estate of James D. Holman, deceased, Joan A. Stearns, Gayle N. and Betsy A. Phillips, Jeffrey A. Corson, Mary Ann McHale, Ronnie L. and Melissa T. DeWalt, and Anthony J. and Meredith L. Hayes (collectively, Appellees).3 The judgment was entered after a nonjury trial at which the trial court determined that Appellees were not required to pay Appellant to maintain a shared easement used to access their properties. The trial court made this determination because a subdivision map was not admitted into evidence and the court could not determine whether Appellees were part of a planned residential community. Appellant claims that Appellees have a common law obligation to pay for the maintenance of the shared easement. We vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The trial court summarized the relevant background to this case as follows:
Trial Ct. Op., 7/14/17, at 2-4 (citations omitted).
After forming as an HOA in 2013, Appellant began to charge a yearly fee of $300 to its members. The fees were used to maintain and repair the only common areas in the HOA, which are Wag-Myr Lane and a gate installed on the roadway in 2004. N.T., 5/24/17, at 89; Compl., 7/26/16, at 12-13. Appellees were made aware of the $300 per year assessment fee via hand-delivered letters dated April 17, 2014, and February 26, 2015, and a mailed letter dated February 5, 2016. See Appellees' Exs. 31, 36, 43.
Appellant initiated this action by filing a complaint on July 26, 2016, asserting that even though Appellees were not members of the HOA, they were required to pay the HOA's entire yearly assessment fee of $300 per year plus interest for the years 2014, 2015, and 2016. Appellant brought its claim for HOA fees on a common law right to recover for maintenance costs for Wag-Myr Lane based upon the easement language in each of the Appellees' deeds.6
The non-Hayes Appellees filed an answer to the complaint, denying liability because the HOA was formed after they purchased their properties and the HOA bylaws did not affect them. See Answer to Compl., 8/19/16, at 3-4 (unpaginated). The Hayes Appellees did not file an answer.
Appellant did not file a motion for default or summary judgment.
Thereafter, the non-Hayes Appellees filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings or for summary judgment. At the January 26, 2017 argument, counsel for the non-Hayes Appellees conceded that they had a duty to pay for the maintenance of Wag-Myr Lane "[f]or their section." N.T., 1/26/17, at 10; see also id. at 6-7. The trial court denied the non-Hayes motion, indicating that "all [non-Hayes Appellees] have agreed that there is a common law obligation on behalf of [them] to pay some monies to maintain a right-of-way." Order, 1/27/17, at 2 (unpaginated).
On April 20, 2017, Appellant filed an amended complaint, seeking that the Hayes Appellees pay the full assessment fee of $300 per year as assessed and that the non-Hayes Appellees pay an undefined "proportionate share" to maintain the road. Am. Compl., 4/20/17, at 18. The non-Hayes Appellees filed an answer to the amended complaint, in which they denied liability for assessments on the basis that their properties were not part of a planned residential development. See Answer to First Am. Compl., 4/19/17, at 4, 7 (unpaginated). The Hayes Appellees did not file an answer to the amended complaint.7
A non-jury trial proceeded on May 24, 2017, in which HOA members testified on behalf of Appellant, and several of the non-Hayes Appellees testified on their own behalf. The pro se Hayes Appellees were present but neither of them testified.8
Of relevance to this appeal, David Morgan, the HOA president, testified to the maintenance and repairs Wag-Myr Lane required, as well as to the fact that the HOA took ownership of the easement from the developer, Wag-Myr Woodlands, Inc.9 N.T., 5/24/17, at 18. Mr. Morgan indicated the cost of repairs to maintain Wag-Myr Lane completed by contractors during the period from 2014 through 2016. Id. at 20, 26; see also Appellant's Ex. 2 ( ); Appellant's Ex. 5 ( ). Mr. Morgan also indicated that electricity for the gate had to be paid for on a yearly basis and that he and other HOA members had completed trimming and some repairs on the road to save money. N.T., 5/24/17, at 19-20.
An HOA member, Joseph Messinger, also testified on behalf of Appellant. Mr. Messinger indicated that Appellees were observed using Wag-Myr Lane beyond the length of their easement to go deeper into the development. Id. at 58. Non-Hayes Appellees' counsel stipulated that the non-Hayes Appellees used Wag-Myr Lane to visit with other Appellees or HOA members. Id. at 59.
Several non-Hayes Appellees testified that they maintained their portions of Wag-Myr Lane. See id. at 69 (testimony of John Guiswite), 101, 104 (testimony of Jeffrey Corson). Many of the Appellees testified that they plowed their sections of the road when it snowed. See id. at 70-71 (testimony of John Guiswite), 79 (testimony of Thomas Jeffries), 95-96 (testimony of Gayle Phillips), 99-100 (testimony of Jeffrey Corson), 107-08 (testimony of Ronnie DeWalt). Additionally, Appellee Ronnie DeWalt testified regarding installation of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rounick v. Neducsin
... ... Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Assoc. by Morgan v. Guiswite ... ...
-
Kadar-Kallen v. Old Iron Estates Homeowners Ass'n
... ... the instant litigation on December 21, 2017, by filing a complaint seeking a declaratory ... , 718 A.2d 908 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998), and Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Association v. Guiswite , ... A.3d 1018 Wag-Myr Woodlands , 197 A.3d at 1247. The property owners deeds did not refer to the ... ...
-
Bank of America, N.A. v. Scott
... ... a complaint in foreclosure on April 21, 2017. Appellees filed an answer and new matter on ... even in the non-jury trial context." Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Ass'n by Morgan v. Guiswite ... ...
-
Cornell Ardmore, LP v. Isen
... 279 A.3d 1247 (Table) CORNELL ARDMORE, LP v. Lorna ISEN Lorna ... incidents between January 2014 and February 2017. [Appellee] encountered other issues, including ... Wag-Myr Woodlands Homeowners Ass'n v. Guiswite , 197 ... ...