Wagner v. Oregon

Decision Date03 July 1989
Docket Number87-6820.
CitationWagner v. Oregon, 492 U.S. 914 (1989)
PartiesWAGNER v. OREGON.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Sup. Ct. Ore. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted.Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Penry v. Lynaugh, ante, p. 302.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
171 cases
  • In re Cascade Intern. Securities Litigation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • December 16, 1993
    ...the legal opinion of the attorney preparing them for the benefit of the plaintiff"), vacated on other grounds, 492 U.S. 914, 109 S.Ct. 3236, 106 L.Ed.2d 584 (1989). In Schatz, the plaintiffs maintained that the defendant's lawyers were liable for securities fraud since they remained silent ......
  • State v. Montez
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • November 21, 1996
    ...State v. Wagner, 305 Or. 115, 178, 752 P.2d 1136 (1988) (Wagner I ), judgment vacated and remanded on other grounds 492 U.S. 914, 109 S.Ct. 3235, 106 L.Ed.2d 583 (1989). Evidence of defendant's prior early release from prison is not relevant to the issue of defendant's future dangerousness ......
  • In re Windsor Plumbing Supply Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of New York
    • July 7, 1994
    ...other than the enterprise itself. Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1391 (2d Cir.1989) (en banc), vacated, remanded, 492 U.S. 914, 109 S.Ct. 3236, 106 L.Ed.2d 584, original decision adhered to, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992, 110 S.Ct. 539, 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989). Th......
  • State v. Walton
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1991
    ...Court's decision in Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 109 S.Ct. 2934, 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989), that court, in Wagner v. Oregon, 492 U.S. 914, 109 S.Ct. 3235, 106 L.Ed.2d 583 (1989), vacated an Oregon death penalty sentence, because of inadequacy in Oregon's statute providing the method whereby......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Judicial suicide or constitutional autonomy? A capital defendant's right to plead guilty.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 65 No. 1, September 2001
    • September 22, 2001
    ...752 P.2d 1136, 1147 (Or. 1988) (quoting State v. Watkins, 194 S.E.2d 800, 807 (N.C. 1973)), vacated on other grounds, Wagner v. Oregon, 492 U.S. 914 (18) See John H. Langbein, The Criminal Trial before the Lawyers, 45 U. CHI. L. REV. 263, 278-79 (1978) (some capital "defendants did insist o......
  • Chapter 2-4 Officer and Director Liability—Liability for Securities Fraud
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Texas Commercial Causes of Action Claims Title Chapter 2 Business Management Litigation*
    • Invalid date
    ...(5th Cir. 1985); Abell v. Potomac Ins. Co., 858 F.2d 1104, 1136 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. granted, judgment vacated sub nom. Fryar v. Abell, 492 U.S. 914 (1989).[125] Abell v. Potomac Ins. Co., 858 F.2d 1104, 1136, 1137-38 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. granted, judgment vacated sub nom.[126] 15 U.S.C......