Wagner v. Wallowa County
Citation | 148 P. 1140,76 Or. 453 |
Parties | WAGNER v. WALLOWA COUNTY. [d] |
Decision Date | 25 May 1915 |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
In Banc.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Wallowa County; Gustav Anderson, Judge.
Action by A. M. Wagner against Wallowa County. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
This is an action of ejectment in the usual Code form to recover the possession of certain realty in Wallowa county. The defendant denies all the allegations of the complaint, except its own corporate entity. It pleads that it alone is the owner in fee simple and in possession of the property. Another defense is thus stated:
The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that under the act of the legislative assembly of this state of February 26, 1901, entitled "An act to authorize the organization and maintenance of district and county high schools in this state," it was determined by the people of Wallowa county to establish a high school. After considering certain propositions from several towns the county court concluded to locate the institution at Enterprise, and accepted from the plaintiff and his wife a deed to the premises in dispute, in these words:
This instrument was duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded. During the spring and summer of 1907 the county erected a building on the premises for high school purposes, furnished the same all at a total cost of about $25,000, and thereafter maintained a county high school therein up to and including June 1, 1913. It further appears that, upon the initiative petition of certain voters of Wallowa county, a bill was proposed at the general election of November, 1912, for a local law to abolish and discontinue the county high school of Wallowa county, and forbidding the expenditure of public money in its support after the current taxes levied for that purpose had been exhausted. This bill was adopted as a law at the general election of November 5, 1912, and was proclaimed as such by the executive of the state later in the same month. In October, 1912, prior to the election and before any default in the maintenance of the school on the premises had been committed, the plaintiff and his wife made, executed, and delivered to school district No. 21 of Wallowa county the following deed:
This document was also duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded. The funds raised for its support having been fully expended, the school was closed June 1, 1913, since which time the defendant county has not maintained such an institution of learning. Other statements of fact are made in the stipulation, but the foregoing are deemed sufficient for the decision of the case. After hearing the argument of counsel on the agreed statement of facts and the pleadings, the circuit court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant to the effect that it was the owner in fee simple and entitled to the possession of the realty, and that it should recover costs and disbursements from the plaintiff. He has appealed.
D. W. Sheahan, of Enterprise, for appellant. C. R. Eberhard, of La Grande, and A. W. Schaupp, of Joseph (O. M. Corkins, of Enterprise, Cochran & Eberhard, of La Grande, and W. G. Trill, of Joseph, on the brief), for respondent.
BURNETT, J. (after stating the facts as above).
A cognate question was before u...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dolby v. Dillman
... ... Affirmed. POTTER, WIEST, and SHARPE, JJ., dissenting. Appeal from Circuit Court, Washtenaw County, in Chancery; Lester S. Moll, Judge. [278 N.W. 695] Argued before the Entire Bench. Robert J ... 141, 12 Allen 1413; Craig v. Inhabitants of Franklin County, 58 Me. 479;Wagner v. Wallowa County, 76 Or. 453, 148 P. 1140, L.R.A.1916F, 303;Board of Education v. Baker, 124 Tenn ... ...
-
Rowden v. Hogan Woods, LLC
... ... v. Curry County Title , 234 Or. App. 115, 120, 227 P.3d 770 (2010), rev'd in part on other grounds , 350 Or. 81, ... Magness v. Kerr et al. , 121 Or. 373, 379, 254 P. 1012 (1927) ; see also Wagner v. Wallowa County , 76 Or. 453, 464, 148 P. 1140 (1915) (a condition subsequent requires "some ... ...
-
Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Oklahoma City
... ... Appeal ... from District Court, Oklahoma County; Ben Arnold, Judge ... Proceedings ... in condemnation by Local Federal ... etc., Church v. Putnam, 221 A.D. 502, 224 N.Y.S. 651; 23 ... R.C.L. 1103, § 6; Wagner v. Wallowa County, 76 Or ... 453, 148 P. 1140, L.R.A.1916F, 303 ... In 23 ... ...
-
State By and Through Dept. of Transp., Highway Division v. Tolke
... ... 756] Book 118, page 29, records of deeds, Washington County", Oregon.\" The reference is to the deed conveying the strip of land to the Railroad ... \xC2" ... 762] two early Oregon cases, Wagner v. Wallowa County, 76 Or. 453, 148 P. 1140 (1915), and Magness v. Kerr et al., 121 Or. 373, 254 P ... ...