Waite v. Utah Labor Commission

Docket Number20150384
Decision Date01 December 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • Widdison v. State
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • April 29, 2021
    ...the cited cases" in part because it was "clear and straightforward and ha[d] not been called into question by the parties"); Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'n , 2017 UT 86, ¶ 22, 416 P.3d 635 (recognizing that that the court had "more recently" clarified that the "view of the presumption of consti......
  • Patterson v. State
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • August 26, 2021
    ...claims, "[t]he interpretation and Constitutionality of a statute are questions of law that we review for correctness." Waite v. Utah Lab. Comm'n , 2017 UT 86, ¶ 5, 416 P.3d 635.ANALYSIS¶32 Patterson argues that all of his claims can be heard, even those that the PCRA would consider untimely......
  • Kuchcinski v. Box Elder Cnty.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • June 3, 2019
    ...because parties gave "superficial" briefing on the subject and did not engage in any form of originalist analysis); Waite v. Utah Labor Comm’n , 2017 UT 86, ¶ 5 n.4, 416 P.3d 635 (declining to determine whether a section of the Workers’ Compensation Act was facially unconstitutional because......
  • Bylsma v. Willey
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • December 1, 2017
    ... ... R.C. WILLEY, a Utah Corporation, Appellee. No. 20140484 Supreme Court of Utah. Filed December ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • SUPPLEMENTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING.
    • United States
    • Journal of Appellate Practice and Process Vol. 22 No. 2, June 2022
    • June 22, 2022
    ...the court should order supplemental briefing to remedy his suggestion to overturn precedent sua sponte); Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 416 P.3d 635, 645 n.73 (Utah 2017) (noting the concurrence suggest the same as in (189.) See, e.g., Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. U.S. Dep't of Justice,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT