Walden v. Smith
| Decision Date | 16 April 2004 |
| Parties | Willadean WALDEN v. Hugh V. SMITH, Jr., et al. Hugh V. Smith, Jr. v. Willadean Walden. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
David E. Hampe, Jr., Birmingham; and Gatewood Walden, Montgomery, for appellant/cross-appellee Willadean Walen.
Alvin T. Prestwood and Linda S. Wellman of Prestwood & Associates, P.C., Montgomery, for appellee/cross-appellant Hugh V. Smith, Jr.
The only matters properly before this Court on appeal are those that address Willadean Walden's fraudulent-suppression claim (case no. 1021518). Walden, however, makes no argument on appeal related to her fraudulent-suppression claim. Walden does raise and argue in her appeal several issues that were properly raised and considered for review in her petition for the writ of certiorari, which this Court has today denied. Ex parte Walden (No. 1021373, April 16, 2004), ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.2004)(table). The issues presented by Hugh Smith in his cross-appeal are properly raised and argued; however, the trial court did not err in its disposition of those issues. For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in both Walden's appeal (case no. 1021518) and Hugh Smith's cross-appeal (case no. 1021526).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Walden v. ES Capital, LLC
...Circuit Court to vacate its August 11, 2000, judgment. On April 16, 2004, this Court affirmed the March 2003 judgment, Walden v. Smith, 891 So.2d 837 (Ala.2004), and denied Walden's certiorari petition. Ex parte Walden (No. 1021373), 916 So.2d 632 (Ala.2004) (table). “On June 25, 2003, R. W......
-
Willadean Walden & Crooked Creek Properties Inc. v. ES Capital, LLC
...Circuit Court to vacate its August 11, 2000, judgment. On April 16, 2004, this Court affirmed the March 2003 judgment, Walden v. Smith, 891 So. 2d 837 (Ala. 2004), and denied Walden's certiorari petition. Ex parte Walden (No. 1021373), 916 So. 2d 632 (Ala. 2004) (table)."On June 25, 2003, R......
-
Walden v. Hutchinson
...Sandlin (No. 1050324, May 12, 2006), 976 So.2d 1059 (Ala.2006) (table); Ex parte Walden, 916 So.2d 632 (Ala.2004) (table); Walden v. Smith, 891 So.2d 837 (Ala.2004); and Ex parte Walden, 785 So.2d 335 (Ala. 2000). At its outset, the litigation involved Walden and the late Hugh V. Smith, Jr.......
- Welch v. Montgomery Eye Physicians, PC