Walker v. Oliver

Citation1872 WL 8147,63 Ill. 199
PartiesMOSES WALKERv.FRANKLIN OLIVER.
Decision Date31 January 1872
CourtSupreme Court of Illinois

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Ford county.

This was an action commenced on the 31st day of March, 1868, by Moses Walker against Franklin Oliver and others. Judgment was obtained against Oliver by default, and a jury was sworn to assess the damages, who returned a verdict against him for $5500, upon which judgment was entered. At a subsequent term of the court, upon motion of Oliver, this judgment was set aside. From the order of the court setting aside this judgment, Walker prosecutes this writ of error.

Mr. EDWARD H. BRACKETT, for the plaintiff in error.

Messrs. CLOUD & SAMPLE, for the defendant in error.

Mr. JUSTICE BREESE delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is quite evident the plaintiff in error is premature in suing out this writ of error, for the reason the record shows no final judgment from which an appeal or writ of error would lie. All that the circuit court did was to set aside a judgment previously rendered in that court, which decides nothing.

When the cause is again tried, and a final judgment entered, an appeal or writ of error will lie, on which it can be assigned as error setting aside this judgment at a term subsequent to the one at which it was rendered. That is the case of Cook v. Wood, 24 Ill. 295.

For the reasons given, the writ of error must be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Williams v. A. E. Staley Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • February 4, 1980
    ...jurisdiction after the prior judgment has become final. (See City of Park Ridge v. Murphy (1913), 258 Ill. 365, 101 N.E. 524; Walker v. Oliver (1872), 63 Ill. 199; Cook v. Wood (1860), 24 Ill. 295.) However, we have traced this rule to its source and have discovered that the case which is c......
  • Cramer v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'n
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1913
  • Barnes v. Henshaw
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • April 18, 1907
  • North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • October 29, 1896
    ...Hill v. Railroad Co., 140 U.S. 52, 35 L.Ed. 331, 11 S.Ct. 690. See Stewart v. Masterson, 131 U.S. 151, 33 L.Ed. 114, 9 S.Ct. 682; Walker v. Oliver, 63 Ill. 199; Brown v. Edgerton (Neb.) 14 Neb. 453, N.W. 474; Tinly v. Martin, 80 Ky. 463; Truett v. Rains, 17 S.C. 451; Ray v. Northrup, 55 Wis......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT